PLEASE NOTE: If you do not see a GRAPHIC IMAGE of a family tree here but are seeing this text
instead then it is most probably because the web server is not correctly configured to serve svg
pages correctly.
see http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/SVG:Server_Configuration for information on how to
correctly configure a web server for svg files.
?
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Marriage (ten children)
Marriage (eleven children)
Marriage (six children)
Marriage (three children)
Marriage (nine children)
Marriage (nine children)
Marriage (four children)
(five children)
Marriage (fifteen children)
(ten children)
Marriage (thirteen children)
Marriage
Marriage (nine children)
Marriage
Marriage (seven children)
Marriage (eleven children)
(two children)
Marriage (twelve children)
Marriage (six children)
Marriage
Marriage
Marriage (ten children)
Marriage (a child)
(five children)
Marriage (a child)
(eight children)
(two children)
Marriage (nine children)
(a child)
Marriage (nine children)
(a child)
Marriage
Marriage (seven children)
(two children)
(three children)
Marriage (seven children)
(a child)
(a child)
Marriage
Marriage
Marriage
Marriage
(six children)
Marriage
(nine children)
(eleven children)
(four children)
Marriage (nine children)
Marriage (eight children)
(six children)
(ten children)
Marriage (two children)
Marriage (two children)
(two children)
(a child)
(a child)
Marriage
Marriage
(ten children)
Marriage
(a child)
Marriage
Marriage
Marriage (a child)
(a child)
Marriage (three children)
(four children)
Marriage
Marriage
(a child)
(a child)
(a child)
Marriage
Marriage
1719
William
Jacob
Dye
1779 - 1858
Delilah
Dye
79
79
living in household of Charles Wesley in Casey Co., KY 1850 census
1832 - UNKNOWN
Katherine
Barber
1813 - 1903
John B.
"Pony"
Wesley
89
89
John's nickname was Pony Wesley. From the 1870 Pulaski County, Kentucky census Mt. Gilied District P.O. Adams" Mill page 227 and household number 247: Wesley, John B. 59 Male Farmer 1527 Ky Mary 58 Female Ky Frances M. 21 Female Ky Silas 17 Male Ky Ware, Julia Ann 7 Female Ky IGI Individual Record FamilySearch? International Genealogical Index v5.0 North America Search Results | Download | Pedigree JOHN WESLEY Male Family Marriages: Spouse: POLLY DICK Family Marriage: 14 APR 1833 , Pulaski, Kentucky Messages: Form submitted by a member of the LDS Church. The form lists the submitter's name and address and may include source information. The address may be outdated. Details vary. To find the form, you must know the batch and sheet number. Source Information: Batch Number: 7632317 Sheet: 43 Source Call No.: 1058831 Type: Film
1812 - 1882
Mary
"Polly"
Dick
70
70
1818 - UNKNOWN
George
Killingsworth
Dye
Listed as Free Inhabitant in 1850 & 1860 Census Excerpt from Federalist Papers No. 42 by James Madison http://madison.thefreelibrary.com/Federalist-Papers-Authored-by-James-Madison/1-8 The regulation of commerce with the Indian tribes is very properly unfettered from two limitations in the articles of Confederation, which render the provision obscure and contradictory. The power is there restrained to Indians, not members of any of the States, and is not to violate or infringe the legislative right of any State within its own limits. What description of Indians are to be deemed members of a State, is not yet settled, and has been a question of frequent perplexity and contention in the federal councils. And how the trade with Indians, though not members of a State, yet residing within its legislative jurisdiction, can be regulated by an external authority, without so far intruding on the internal rights of legislation, is absolutely incomprehensible. This is not the only case in which the articles of Confederation have inconsiderately endeavored to accomplish impossibilities; to reconcile a partial sovereignty in the Union, with complete sovereignty in the States; to subvert a mathematical axiom, by taking away a part, and letting the whole remain. The dissimilarity in the rules of naturalization has long been remarked as a fault in our system, and as laying a foundation for intricate and delicate questions. In the fourth article of the Confederation, it is declared "that the FREE INHABITANTS of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice, excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of FREE CITIZENS in the several States; and THE PEOPLE of each State shall, in every other, enjoy all the privileges of trade and commerce," etc. There is a confusion of language here, which is remarkable. Why the terms FREE INHABITANTS are used in one part of the article, FREE CITIZENS in another, and PEOPLE in another; or what was meant by superadding to "all privileges and immunities of free citizens," "all the privileges of trade and commerce," cannot easily be determined. It seems to be a construction scarcely avoidable, however, that those who come under the denomination of FREE INHABITANTS of a State, although not citizens of such State, are entitled, in every other State, to all the privileges of FREE CITIZENS of the latter; that is, to greater privileges than they may be entitled to in their own State: so that it may be in the power of a particular State, or rather every State is laid under a necessity, not only to confer the rights of citizenship in other States upon any whom it may admit to such rights within itself, but upon any whom it may allow to become inhabitants within its jurisdiction. But were an exposition of the term "inhabitants" to be admitted which would confine the stipulated privileges to citizens alone, the difficulty is diminished only, not removed. The very improper power would still be retained by each State, of naturalizing aliens in every other State. In one State, residence for a short term confirms all the rights of citizenship: in another, qualifications of greater importance are required. An alien, therefore, legally incapacitated for certain rights in the latter, may, by previous residence only in the former, elude his incapacity; and thus the law of one State be preposterously rendered paramount to the law of another, within the jurisdiction of the other. We owe it to mere casualty, that very serious embarrassments on this subject have been hitherto escaped. By the laws of several States, certain descriptions of aliens, who had rendered themselves obnoxious, were laid under interdicts inconsistent not only with the rights of citizenship but with the privilege of residence. What would have been the consequence, if such persons, by residence or otherwise, had acquired the character of citizens under the laws of another State, and then asserted their rights as such, both to residence and citizenship, within the State proscribing them? Whatever the legal consequences might have been, other consequences would probably have resulted, of too serious a nature not to be provided against. The new Constitution has accordingly, with great propriety, made provision against them, and all others proceeding from the defect of the Confederation on this head, by authorizing the general government to establish a uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States. Excerpt from Founders Constitution http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a4_2_1s17.html In the fourth Article it was agreed, the better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the several States in this Union, that "the free inhabitants of each of these States,--paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice excepted,--shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; The word "citizen" imports the same as the word "freeman" in our old Acts of Assembly; and means every white man, who, by birth or naturalization, is or may be qualified to exercise and enjoy, under like circumstances, all the rights which any native born, white inhabitant of the State does or can enjoy. And every white man, born or naturalized in any other State, is such a citizen of such other State as to be entitled, in this State, to all the civil rights of citizenship, and by residence and other qualifications to all the political rights. Following comes from <http://www.aagsnc.org/columns/mar99col.htm> -- Buffalo Ridge Cherokee - Remnants of a Nation Divided According to tradition, the Allegeni, the ancestors of the modern Cherokee, were defeated by the Delaware-Iroquois alliance and moved into Virginia. The settled in New Holston Valley after residing for a period of time at the Peaks of Otter in Bedford County 4(Johnson, 34). In just twenty years, from 1880 to 1900, the Indians in Amherst County were systematically erased from the record books by the stroke of a pen. They were forced by law in 1705 to be called "mulatto" and then called "black" in 1900. Many of the Cherokee descendants of Amherst County accepted this term without resistance. In fact, by 1850, as "Free Inhabitants" of Amherst County, the Cherokee families lived in the communities with blacks and whites and many of the families "went" for black or white, depending on the racial community in which they lived and felt secure ( p. 37). Appears on 1850 Pulaski County Kentucky District # 2 Census as follows: George K. Hinds 32 M Farmer $200 KY Rutha 33 F KY Nancy 10 F Ky Eleanor 8 F KY Susannah 6 F KY Sarah 5 F KY Lemont 2 M KY Census: 1850 Pulaski Co. KY, land value $200. Census: 1870 Pulaski Co. KY, land value $1,874 name listed as Killingsworth Occupation: BET. 1850 - 1870 Farmer
1817 - 1877
Rutha
Dye
60
60
Listed as Free Inhabitant in 1850 Census Excerpt from Federalist Papers No. 42 by James Madison http://madison.thefreelibrary.com/Federalist-Papers-Authored-by-James-Madison/1-8 The regulation of commerce with the Indian tribes is very properly unfettered from two limitations in the articles of Confederation, which render the provision obscure and contradictory. The power is there restrained to Indians, not members of any of the States, and is not to violate or infringe the legislative right of any State within its own limits. What description of Indians are to be deemed members of a State, is not yet settled, and has been a question of frequent perplexity and contention in the federal councils. And how the trade with Indians, though not members of a State, yet residing within its legislative jurisdiction, can be regulated by an external authority, without so far intruding on the internal rights of legislation, is absolutely incomprehensible. This is not the only case in which the articles of Confederation have inconsiderately endeavored to accomplish impossibilities; to reconcile a partial sovereignty in the Union, with complete sovereignty in the States; to subvert a mathematical axiom, by taking away a part, and letting the whole remain. The dissimilarity in the rules of naturalization has long been remarked as a fault in our system, and as laying a foundation for intricate and delicate questions. In the fourth article of the Confederation, it is declared "that the FREE INHABITANTS of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice, excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of FREE CITIZENS in the several States; and THE PEOPLE of each State shall, in every other, enjoy all the privileges of trade and commerce," etc. There is a confusion of language here, which is remarkable. Why the terms FREE INHABITANTS are used in one part of the article, FREE CITIZENS in another, and PEOPLE in another; or what was meant by superadding to "all privileges and immunities of free citizens," "all the privileges of trade and commerce," cannot easily be determined. It seems to be a construction scarcely avoidable, however, that those who come under the denomination of FREE INHABITANTS of a State, although not citizens of such State, are entitled, in every other State, to all the privileges of FREE CITIZENS of the latter; that is, to greater privileges than they may be entitled to in their own State: so that it may be in the power of a particular State, or rather every State is laid under a necessity, not only to confer the rights of citizenship in other States upon any whom it may admit to such rights within itself, but upon any whom it may allow to become inhabitants within its jurisdiction. But were an exposition of the term "inhabitants" to be admitted which would confine the stipulated privileges to citizens alone, the difficulty is diminished only, not removed. The very improper power would still be retained by each State, of naturalizing aliens in every other State. In one State, residence for a short term confirms all the rights of citizenship: in another, qualifications of greater importance are required. An alien, therefore, legally incapacitated for certain rights in the latter, may, by previous residence only in the former, elude his incapacity; and thus the law of one State be preposterously rendered paramount to the law of another, within the jurisdiction of the other. We owe it to mere casualty, that very serious embarrassments on this subject have been hitherto escaped. By the laws of several States, certain descriptions of aliens, who had rendered themselves obnoxious, were laid under interdicts inconsistent not only with the rights of citizenship but with the privilege of residence. What would have been the consequence, if such persons, by residence or otherwise, had acquired the character of citizens under the laws of another State, and then asserted their rights as such, both to residence and citizenship, within the State proscribing them? Whatever the legal consequences might have been, other consequences would probably have resulted, of too serious a nature not to be provided against. The new Constitution has accordingly, with great propriety, made provision against them, and all others proceeding from the defect of the Confederation on this head, by authorizing the general government to establish a uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States. Excerpt from Founders Constitution http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a4_2_1s17.html In the fourth Article it was agreed, the better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the several States in this Union, that "the free inhabitants of each of these States,--paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice excepted,--shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; The word "citizen" imports the same as the word "freeman" in our old Acts of Assembly; and means every white man, who, by birth or naturalization, is or may be qualified to exercise and enjoy, under like circumstances, all the rights which any native born, white inhabitant of the State does or can enjoy. And every white man, born or naturalized in any other State, is such a citizen of such other State as to be entitled, in this State, to all the civil rights of citizenship, and by residence and other qualifications to all the political rights. Following comes from <http://www.aagsnc.org/columns/mar99col.htm> -- Buffalo Ridge Cherokee - Remnants of a Nation Divided According to tradition, the Allegeni, the ancestors of the modern Cherokee, were defeated by the Delaware-Iroquois alliance and moved into Virginia. The settled in New Holston Valley after residing for a period of time at the Peaks of Otter in Bedford County 4(Johnson, 34). In just twenty years, from 1880 to 1900, the Indians in Amherst County were systematically erased from the record books by the stroke of a pen. They were forced by law in 1705 to be called "mulatto" and then called "black" in 1900. Many of the Cherokee descendants of Amherst County accepted this term without resistance. In fact, by 1850, as "Free Inhabitants" of Amherst County, the Cherokee families lived in the communities with blacks and whites and many of the families "went" for black or white, depending on the racial community in which they lived and felt secure ( p. 37). Title: Sarah Kinsy Dye Wesley - Death Certificate - Pulaski Kentucky Title: 1850 Census - George K Dye - Pulaski Kentucky Publication: Year: 1850; Census Place: Division 2, Pulaski, Kentucky; Roll: M432_217; Page: 115; Image: 358. Title: 1860 Census - Killingsworth Dye - Pulaski Kentucky Publication: Year: 1860; Census Place: District 1, Pulaski, Kentucky; Roll: M653_393; Page: 0; Image: 412. Title: 1870 Census - William Wesley - Mt Gilied Pulaski Kentucky Publication: Year: 1870; Census Place: MT Gilied, Pulaski, Kentucky; Roll: M593_496; Page: 292; Image: 265.
1786 - 1868
John
Dick
81
81
Mormon Library Records Information on his birth from Rev. War Widow's Pension W. 8668 National Archives. He is age 65 in the 1850 U.S. Census in Pulaski Co., Ky and age 74 in the 1860 census same county, but his second wife appears alone with children in the 1870 census so he is presumed dead by then. From the 1850 Pulaski County Kentucky census records, District 2 page 219 Household 612: Note: Dick, John Sr. 65 M Farmer 2000 SC Lydia 50 F VA Bulers 23 M Ky Elsey 22 F Ky Nancy 20 F Ky Delila 16 F Ky James 15 M Ky Katharine 13 F Ky John 11 M Ky Elizabeth 7 F Ky Note: birth: Rev. War Widow's Pensin W.8668, National Archives. He is age 65 in the 1850 U.S. Census in Pulaski Co., Ky and age 74 in the 1860 census for the same county, but his second wife appears alone with children in the 1870 census. So he is presumed dead by then. Marriage: #1: Hazel DICK SMITH states the marriage date came from a family Bible. Pulaski County, Ky marriage book I. Blanche Keeney Stephens gives his marriage date as 1807 in Pulaski County, Ky to Fanny REAGAN, and she dying between 1821 and 1824 in Pulaski County, Ky. Note: Marriage #2: Pulaski County, Ky marriage bonds Book I page 71. Death: There is a grave of a Lidia DICK 9 Aug 1801- 28 May 1880 (Fieldstone) in the Dick Family Cem. so John DICK Jr. may also be buried there. This from the book "Pulaski County, Ky Cemetery Records" compiled by the Pulaski County, Ky Historical Society. Marilyn TANNER states that there is an old fieldstone illegible with the appearance of a J----- believed to be that of John DICK Jr. To get to the DICK Cemetery take Hwy. 1676 in Science Hill, Ky.
1852 - 1931
Silas
Wesley
78
78
1782 - UNKNOWN
Ellen
McClara
Wesley
Listed as Free Inhabitant in 1850 Census Excerpt from Federalist Papers No. 42 by James Madison http://madison.thefreelibrary.com/Federalist-Papers-Authored-by-James-Madison/1-8 The regulation of commerce with the Indian tribes is very properly unfettered from two limitations in the articles of Confederation, which render the provision obscure and contradictory. The power is there restrained to Indians, not members of any of the States, and is not to violate or infringe the legislative right of any State within its own limits. What description of Indians are to be deemed members of a State, is not yet settled, and has been a question of frequent perplexity and contention in the federal councils. And how the trade with Indians, though not members of a State, yet residing within its legislative jurisdiction, can be regulated by an external authority, without so far intruding on the internal rights of legislation, is absolutely incomprehensible. This is not the only case in which the articles of Confederation have inconsiderately endeavored to accomplish impossibilities; to reconcile a partial sovereignty in the Union, with complete sovereignty in the States; to subvert a mathematical axiom, by taking away a part, and letting the whole remain. The dissimilarity in the rules of naturalization has long been remarked as a fault in our system, and as laying a foundation for intricate and delicate questions. In the fourth article of the Confederation, it is declared "that the FREE INHABITANTS of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice, excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of FREE CITIZENS in the several States; and THE PEOPLE of each State shall, in every other, enjoy all the privileges of trade and commerce," etc. There is a confusion of language here, which is remarkable. Why the terms FREE INHABITANTS are used in one part of the article, FREE CITIZENS in another, and PEOPLE in another; or what was meant by superadding to "all privileges and immunities of free citizens," "all the privileges of trade and commerce," cannot easily be determined. It seems to be a construction scarcely avoidable, however, that those who come under the denomination of FREE INHABITANTS of a State, although not citizens of such State, are entitled, in every other State, to all the privileges of FREE CITIZENS of the latter; that is, to greater privileges than they may be entitled to in their own State: so that it may be in the power of a particular State, or rather every State is laid under a necessity, not only to confer the rights of citizenship in other States upon any whom it may admit to such rights within itself, but upon any whom it may allow to become inhabitants within its jurisdiction. But were an exposition of the term "inhabitants" to be admitted which would confine the stipulated privileges to citizens alone, the difficulty is diminished only, not removed. The very improper power would still be retained by each State, of naturalizing aliens in every other State. In one State, residence for a short term confirms all the rights of citizenship: in another, qualifications of greater importance are required. An alien, therefore, legally incapacitated for certain rights in the latter, may, by previous residence only in the former, elude his incapacity; and thus the law of one State be preposterously rendered paramount to the law of another, within the jurisdiction of the other. We owe it to mere casualty, that very serious embarrassments on this subject have been hitherto escaped. By the laws of several States, certain descriptions of aliens, who had rendered themselves obnoxious, were laid under interdicts inconsistent not only with the rights of citizenship but with the privilege of residence. What would have been the consequence, if such persons, by residence or otherwise, had acquired the character of citizens under the laws of another State, and then asserted their rights as such, both to residence and citizenship, within the State proscribing them? Whatever the legal consequences might have been, other consequences would probably have resulted, of too serious a nature not to be provided against. The new Constitution has accordingly, with great propriety, made provision against them, and all others proceeding from the defect of the Confederation on this head, by authorizing the general government to establish a uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States. Excerpt from Founders Constitution http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a4_2_1s17.html In the fourth Article it was agreed, the better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the several States in this Union, that "the free inhabitants of each of these States,--paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice excepted,--shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; The word "citizen" imports the same as the word "freeman" in our old Acts of Assembly; and means every white man, who, by birth or naturalization, is or may be qualified to exercise and enjoy, under like circumstances, all the rights which any native born, white inhabitant of the State does or can enjoy. And every white man, born or naturalized in any other State, is such a citizen of such other State as to be entitled, in this State, to all the civil rights of citizenship, and by residence and other qualifications to all the political rights. Following comes from <http://www.aagsnc.org/columns/mar99col.htm> -- Buffalo Ridge Cherokee - Remnants of a Nation Divided According to tradition, the Allegeni, the ancestors of the modern Cherokee, were defeated by the Delaware-Iroquois alliance and moved into Virginia. The settled in New Holston Valley after residing for a period of time at the Peaks of Otter in Bedford County 4(Johnson, 34). In just twenty years, from 1880 to 1900, the Indians in Amherst County were systematically erased from the record books by the stroke of a pen. They were forced by law in 1705 to be called "mulatto" and then called "black" in 1900. Many of the Cherokee descendants of Amherst County accepted this term without resistance. In fact, by 1850, as "Free Inhabitants" of Amherst County, the Cherokee families lived in the communities with blacks and whites and many of the families "went" for black or white, depending on the racial community in which they lived and felt secure ( p. 37).
1770 - 1797
James
Richard
Randolph
27
27
LINEAGE: Edgecomb County, North Carolina Record Book of Marks and Brands 1732-1809". "James Randal, son of Alexander Randal, A Crop & two Slits in their right Ear & a Flower ??????? over half of moon in y left." !RESIDENCE: Edgecomb, County, NC Source: Randolph Newsletter, Volume 1 Issue 4 Fall 1999 Will of James Randolph Senior October Courte 1797 In the name of God Amen. This 15th day of June in the year of our Lord One Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety Seven. I James Randolph Senior of the county of Caswell and State of North Carolina, being sick and weak in body but of sound mind and memory. Thanks be given to teh Almighty God. And calling to mind the Mortality of my body and undertainty of this life, do make and ordain this my last will and testament in the following Manner and form. And first I yield my soul unto the hands of Almighty god who gave it and my body to the earth to be decently buried in a Christian Manner. And as for such Worldly goods as it hath pleased God to bless me with in this life, I dispose of them in the following manner--Impremise I give and bequeath to my son John Randolph the land and plantation whereon I now live, containing one hundred and forty one acres when he arrives to the age of twenty one years, to him and his heirs and assigns forever. And if he dies without age, then I leave the lad to Nimrod, also five pounds Virginia money, to him his heirs and assigns forever.-------Item. I give and bequeath to my daughter Rebeccah Randolph one feather bed and furniture called her bed and one half the pewter belonging to the house and one cow to her and her Heirs forever.-----Item. I lend to my well beloved wife, Mary Randolph, all the residue of my estate during her widowhood but be it remembered that should my wife marry that then her estate hereby lent to her shall be equally divided between my son Jeremiah Randolph and my son Nimrod.------It is my wish and Desire that if after my death that my wife should die before my young children arrive at age that Robert my son should take his brother John and raise him and that William should take Nimrod and raise him to age.------Lastly I constitute ordain and appoint my beloved son James Randolph and my son-in-law, William Dye Executors of this my last Will and Testament; and I do hereby revoke and make void all Other will or Wills heretofore by me made, ratifying and confirming this ony to be my last will and testament. Testimony wherof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the Day and Year frist above written. SIGNED SEALED PUBLISHED HIS MARK JAMES R RANDOLPH Pronounced and declared as the last will and testament of James Randolph in presence of Each of us: A. E. Murphey (Jurat), Wm. Gordon (Jurat) HIS MARK John X. Carter Caswell County The Execution of this will was duly proved in Open Court by the oaths of Archibald Murphey and William Gordon, two subscribing witnesses and on Motion ordered to be recorded at the same time. James Randolph and William Dye qualified Executors-----A. E. Murphey (jurat) (There follows an inventory and proceeds of the sale of various hogs, a cow and calf and two steers, all of which brought 41 pounds, no shillings and 6 pence.) Source: Randolph Newsletter, Volume 1 Issue 4 Fall 1999 Transcription of land grant in Caswell County for services rendered to the State. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA To all to whom these Presents shall come, Greeting. Know ye that we for and consideration of the sum of fifty shillings for every hundred acres hereby granted paid into our treasury by James Randolph have given and granted by these presents do give and grant unto the said James Randolph a tract of land consisting three hundred sixty acres lying and being in our County of Caswell on the waters of Mill Creek and County Line Creek beginning at a white oak, corner of Abram Dunaway and running thence to west fifty chain to white oak, thence north with Ragsdale's line seventy two chain to a stake on Ann Smith's line thence her line east fifty chain crossing the creek to a pine, thence south seventy two chain to the fist station as by the plat hereunto annexed doth appear together with all Woods Waters or Mines mineral thereon and appurtenanced to the said land belonging and appertaining to the said James Randolph his heirs and assigns forever & yielding and paying to us such sums of money yearly or otherwise as our general assembly from time to time may direct. Provided always that the said James Randolph shall cause this grant to be registered in the register's office of our said county of Caswell within twelve months from date hereof otherwise the same shall be void & of no office. In Testimony whereof we have caused our great seal to be hereunto affixed. Witnesseth Richard Caswell, Esq, our Governor Captain General & Commander in Chief at King's. The twentieth Day of December in the fourth year of our Independence & in the year of our Lord One Thousand Seven Hundred & Seventy Nine. By His Excellency's Command SIGNED BY COL FRANK CURLES AND R. A. CASWELL The 1820 Census of Pulaski Co. lists Nimrod Randolph. Notes from Rootsweb: ID: I1543 Name: Nimrod RANDOLPH Sex: M Birth: BET. 1789 - 1790 in Caswell County, NC Death: 27 MAY 1874 Father: James R. RANDOLPH b: 1725 in VA or NC Mother: Mary DYE b: 5 DEC 1753 in King George County, VA
1782 - UNKNOWN
Shadrack
Dye
Listed as Free Inhabiant in 1850 Census Excerpt from Federalist Papers No. 42 by James Madison http://madison.thefreelibrary.com/Federalist-Papers-Authored-by-James-Madison/1-8 The regulation of commerce with the Indian tribes is very properly unfettered from two limitations in the articles of Confederation, which render the provision obscure and contradictory. The power is there restrained to Indians, not members of any of the States, and is not to violate or infringe the legislative right of any State within its own limits. What description of Indians are to be deemed members of a State, is not yet settled, and has been a question of frequent perplexity and contention in the federal councils. And how the trade with Indians, though not members of a State, yet residing within its legislative jurisdiction, can be regulated by an external authority, without so far intruding on the internal rights of legislation, is absolutely incomprehensible. This is not the only case in which the articles of Confederation have inconsiderately endeavored to accomplish impossibilities; to reconcile a partial sovereignty in the Union, with complete sovereignty in the States; to subvert a mathematical axiom, by taking away a part, and letting the whole remain. The dissimilarity in the rules of naturalization has long been remarked as a fault in our system, and as laying a foundation for intricate and delicate questions. In the fourth article of the Confederation, it is declared "that the FREE INHABITANTS of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice, excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of FREE CITIZENS in the several States; and THE PEOPLE of each State shall, in every other, enjoy all the privileges of trade and commerce," etc. There is a confusion of language here, which is remarkable. Why the terms FREE INHABITANTS are used in one part of the article, FREE CITIZENS in another, and PEOPLE in another; or what was meant by superadding to "all privileges and immunities of free citizens," "all the privileges of trade and commerce," cannot easily be determined. It seems to be a construction scarcely avoidable, however, that those who come under the denomination of FREE INHABITANTS of a State, although not citizens of such State, are entitled, in every other State, to all the privileges of FREE CITIZENS of the latter; that is, to greater privileges than they may be entitled to in their own State: so that it may be in the power of a particular State, or rather every State is laid under a necessity, not only to confer the rights of citizenship in other States upon any whom it may admit to such rights within itself, but upon any whom it may allow to become inhabitants within its jurisdiction. But were an exposition of the term "inhabitants" to be admitted which would confine the stipulated privileges to citizens alone, the difficulty is diminished only, not removed. The very improper power would still be retained by each State, of naturalizing aliens in every other State. In one State, residence for a short term confirms all the rights of citizenship: in another, qualifications of greater importance are required. An alien, therefore, legally incapacitated for certain rights in the latter, may, by previous residence only in the former, elude his incapacity; and thus the law of one State be preposterously rendered paramount to the law of another, within the jurisdiction of the other. We owe it to mere casualty, that very serious embarrassments on this subject have been hitherto escaped. By the laws of several States, certain descriptions of aliens, who had rendered themselves obnoxious, were laid under interdicts inconsistent not only with the rights of citizenship but with the privilege of residence. What would have been the consequence, if such persons, by residence or otherwise, had acquired the character of citizens under the laws of another State, and then asserted their rights as such, both to residence and citizenship, within the State proscribing them? Whatever the legal consequences might have been, other consequences would probably have resulted, of too serious a nature not to be provided against. The new Constitution has accordingly, with great propriety, made provision against them, and all others proceeding from the defect of the Confederation on this head, by authorizing the general government to establish a uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States. Excerpt from Founders Constitution http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a4_2_1s17.html In the fourth Article it was agreed, the better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the several States in this Union, that "the free inhabitants of each of these States,--paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice excepted,--shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; The word "citizen" imports the same as the word "freeman" in our old Acts of Assembly; and means every white man, who, by birth or naturalization, is or may be qualified to exercise and enjoy, under like circumstances, all the rights which any native born, white inhabitant of the State does or can enjoy. And every white man, born or naturalized in any other State, is such a citizen of such other State as to be entitled, in this State, to all the civil rights of citizenship, and by residence and other qualifications to all the political rights. Following comes from <http://www.aagsnc.org/columns/mar99col.htm> -- Buffalo Ridge Cherokee - Remnants of a Nation Divided According to tradition, the Allegeni, the ancestors of the modern Cherokee, were defeated by the Delaware-Iroquois alliance and moved into Virginia. The settled in New Holston Valley after residing for a period of time at the Peaks of Otter in Bedford County 4(Johnson, 34). In just twenty years, from 1880 to 1900, the Indians in Amherst County were systematically erased from the record books by the stroke of a pen. They were forced by law in 1705 to be called "mulatto" and then called "black" in 1900. Many of the Cherokee descendants of Amherst County accepted this term without resistance. In fact, by 1850, as "Free Inhabitants" of Amherst County, the Cherokee families lived in the communities with blacks and whites and many of the families "went" for black or white, depending on the racial community in which they lived and felt secure ( p. 37).
1799 - 1865
Thomas
Ray
Wesley
66
66
1801 - 1880
Lydia P.
"Liddie"
Wesley
78
78
1803 - UNKNOWN
William
Wesley
1827 - UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Ann
Barber
1816 - UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Wesley
1820 - UNKNOWN
Charles
Wesley
1842 - UNKNOWN
Mahulda
"Hulda"
Hinds
1806 - UNKNOWN
Charles
Barber
Listed on 1850 Census as Free Inhabitant Excerpt from Federalist Papers No. 42 by James Madison http://madison.thefreelibrary.com/Federalist-Papers-Authored-by-James-Madison/1-8 The regulation of commerce with the Indian tribes is very properly unfettered from two limitations in the articles of Confederation, which render the provision obscure and contradictory. The power is there restrained to Indians, not members of any of the States, and is not to violate or infringe the legislative right of any State within its own limits. What description of Indians are to be deemed members of a State, is not yet settled, and has been a question of frequent perplexity and contention in the federal councils. And how the trade with Indians, though not members of a State, yet residing within its legislative jurisdiction, can be regulated by an external authority, without so far intruding on the internal rights of legislation, is absolutely incomprehensible. This is not the only case in which the articles of Confederation have inconsiderately endeavored to accomplish impossibilities; to reconcile a partial sovereignty in the Union, with complete sovereignty in the States; to subvert a mathematical axiom, by taking away a part, and letting the whole remain. The dissimilarity in the rules of naturalization has long been remarked as a fault in our system, and as laying a foundation for intricate and delicate questions. In the fourth article of the Confederation, it is declared "that the FREE INHABITANTS of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice, excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of FREE CITIZENS in the several States; and THE PEOPLE of each State shall, in every other, enjoy all the privileges of trade and commerce," etc. There is a confusion of language here, which is remarkable. Why the terms FREE INHABITANTS are used in one part of the article, FREE CITIZENS in another, and PEOPLE in another; or what was meant by superadding to "all privileges and immunities of free citizens," "all the privileges of trade and commerce," cannot easily be determined. It seems to be a construction scarcely avoidable, however, that those who come under the denomination of FREE INHABITANTS of a State, although not citizens of such State, are entitled, in every other State, to all the privileges of FREE CITIZENS of the latter; that is, to greater privileges than they may be entitled to in their own State: so that it may be in the power of a particular State, or rather every State is laid under a necessity, not only to confer the rights of citizenship in other States upon any whom it may admit to such rights within itself, but upon any whom it may allow to become inhabitants within its jurisdiction. But were an exposition of the term "inhabitants" to be admitted which would confine the stipulated privileges to citizens alone, the difficulty is diminished only, not removed. The very improper power would still be retained by each State, of naturalizing aliens in every other State. In one State, residence for a short term confirms all the rights of citizenship: in another, qualifications of greater importance are required. An alien, therefore, legally incapacitated for certain rights in the latter, may, by previous residence only in the former, elude his incapacity; and thus the law of one State be preposterously rendered paramount to the law of another, within the jurisdiction of the other. We owe it to mere casualty, that very serious embarrassments on this subject have been hitherto escaped. By the laws of several States, certain descriptions of aliens, who had rendered themselves obnoxious, were laid under interdicts inconsistent not only with the rights of citizenship but with the privilege of residence. What would have been the consequence, if such persons, by residence or otherwise, had acquired the character of citizens under the laws of another State, and then asserted their rights as such, both to residence and citizenship, within the State proscribing them? Whatever the legal consequences might have been, other consequences would probably have resulted, of too serious a nature not to be provided against. The new Constitution has accordingly, with great propriety, made provision against them, and all others proceeding from the defect of the Confederation on this head, by authorizing the general government to establish a uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States. Excerpt from Founders Constitution http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a4_2_1s17.html In the fourth Article it was agreed, the better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the several States in this Union, that "the free inhabitants of each of these States,--paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice excepted,--shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; The word "citizen" imports the same as the word "freeman" in our old Acts of Assembly; and means every white man, who, by birth or naturalization, is or may be qualified to exercise and enjoy, under like circumstances, all the rights which any native born, white inhabitant of the State does or can enjoy. And every white man, born or naturalized in any other State, is such a citizen of such other State as to be entitled, in this State, to all the civil rights of citizenship, and by residence and other qualifications to all the political rights. Following comes from <http://www.aagsnc.org/columns/mar99col.htm> -- Buffalo Ridge Cherokee - Remnants of a Nation Divided According to tradition, the Allegeni, the ancestors of the modern Cherokee, were defeated by the Delaware-Iroquois alliance and moved into Virginia. The settled in New Holston Valley after residing for a period of time at the Peaks of Otter in Bedford County 4(Johnson, 34). In just twenty years, from 1880 to 1900, the Indians in Amherst County were systematically erased from the record books by the stroke of a pen. They were forced by law in 1705 to be called "mulatto" and then called "black" in 1900. Many of the Cherokee descendants of Amherst County accepted this term without resistance. In fact, by 1850, as "Free Inhabitants" of Amherst County, the Cherokee families lived in the communities with blacks and whites and many of the families "went" for black or white, depending on the racial community in which they lived and felt secure ( p. 37). Appears on the 1850 Pulaski County Kentucky Census- District #2 as follows: Charles 44 M Farmer $2000 SC Christena 44 F VA Robert 16 M KY John 14 M KY Charles 12 M SC William 10 M KY Hiram 5 M KY Isabella 20 F KY
1806 - UNKNOWN
Christina
Wesley
1775 - 1853
Robert
"Robin"
Wesley
77
77
Listed as Free Inhabitant in 1850 Census Excerpt from Federalist Papers No. 42 by James Madison http://madison.thefreelibrary.com/Federalist-Papers-Authored-by-James-Madison/1-8 The regulation of commerce with the Indian tribes is very properly unfettered from two limitations in the articles of Confederation, which render the provision obscure and contradictory. The power is there restrained to Indians, not members of any of the States, and is not to violate or infringe the legislative right of any State within its own limits. What description of Indians are to be deemed members of a State, is not yet settled, and has been a question of frequent perplexity and contention in the federal councils. And how the trade with Indians, though not members of a State, yet residing within its legislative jurisdiction, can be regulated by an external authority, without so far intruding on the internal rights of legislation, is absolutely incomprehensible. This is not the only case in which the articles of Confederation have inconsiderately endeavored to accomplish impossibilities; to reconcile a partial sovereignty in the Union, with complete sovereignty in the States; to subvert a mathematical axiom, by taking away a part, and letting the whole remain. The dissimilarity in the rules of naturalization has long been remarked as a fault in our system, and as laying a foundation for intricate and delicate questions. In the fourth article of the Confederation, it is declared "that the FREE INHABITANTS of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice, excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of FREE CITIZENS in the several States; and THE PEOPLE of each State shall, in every other, enjoy all the privileges of trade and commerce," etc. There is a confusion of language here, which is remarkable. Why the terms FREE INHABITANTS are used in one part of the article, FREE CITIZENS in another, and PEOPLE in another; or what was meant by superadding to "all privileges and immunities of free citizens," "all the privileges of trade and commerce," cannot easily be determined. It seems to be a construction scarcely avoidable, however, that those who come under the denomination of FREE INHABITANTS of a State, although not citizens of such State, are entitled, in every other State, to all the privileges of FREE CITIZENS of the latter; that is, to greater privileges than they may be entitled to in their own State: so that it may be in the power of a particular State, or rather every State is laid under a necessity, not only to confer the rights of citizenship in other States upon any whom it may admit to such rights within itself, but upon any whom it may allow to become inhabitants within its jurisdiction. But were an exposition of the term "inhabitants" to be admitted which would confine the stipulated privileges to citizens alone, the difficulty is diminished only, not removed. The very improper power would still be retained by each State, of naturalizing aliens in every other State. In one State, residence for a short term confirms all the rights of citizenship: in another, qualifications of greater importance are required. An alien, therefore, legally incapacitated for certain rights in the latter, may, by previous residence only in the former, elude his incapacity; and thus the law of one State be preposterously rendered paramount to the law of another, within the jurisdiction of the other. We owe it to mere casualty, that very serious embarrassments on this subject have been hitherto escaped. By the laws of several States, certain descriptions of aliens, who had rendered themselves obnoxious, were laid under interdicts inconsistent not only with the rights of citizenship but with the privilege of residence. What would have been the consequence, if such persons, by residence or otherwise, had acquired the character of citizens under the laws of another State, and then asserted their rights as such, both to residence and citizenship, within the State proscribing them? Whatever the legal consequences might have been, other consequences would probably have resulted, of too serious a nature not to be provided against. The new Constitution has accordingly, with great propriety, made provision against them, and all others proceeding from the defect of the Confederation on this head, by authorizing the general government to establish a uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States. Excerpt from Founders Constitution http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a4_2_1s17.html In the fourth Article it was agreed, the better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the several States in this Union, that "the free inhabitants of each of these States,--paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice excepted,--shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; The word "citizen" imports the same as the word "freeman" in our old Acts of Assembly; and means every white man, who, by birth or naturalization, is or may be qualified to exercise and enjoy, under like circumstances, all the rights which any native born, white inhabitant of the State does or can enjoy. And every white man, born or naturalized in any other State, is such a citizen of such other State as to be entitled, in this State, to all the civil rights of citizenship, and by residence and other qualifications to all the political rights. Following comes from <http://www.aagsnc.org/columns/mar99col.htm> -- Buffalo Ridge Cherokee - Remnants of a Nation Divided According to tradition, the Allegeni, the ancestors of the modern Cherokee, were defeated by the Delaware-Iroquois alliance and moved into Virginia. The settled in New Holston Valley after residing for a period of time at the Peaks of Otter in Bedford County 4(Johnson, 34). In just twenty years, from 1880 to 1900, the Indians in Amherst County were systematically erased from the record books by the stroke of a pen. They were forced by law in 1705 to be called "mulatto" and then called "black" in 1900. Many of the Cherokee descendants of Amherst County accepted this term without resistance. In fact, by 1850, as "Free Inhabitants" of Amherst County, the Cherokee families lived in the communities with blacks and whites and many of the families "went" for black or white, depending on the racial community in which they lived and felt secure ( p. 37).
D. UNKNOWN
James
Barber
1836 - UNKNOWN
Robert
Barber
1838 - UNKNOWN
Charles
V.
Barber
1840 - UNKNOWN
William
Barber
1845 - 1892
Doctor
Hiram L.
Barber
47
47
1848 - 1936
Frances
Mae
Wesley
87
87
1747 - 1823
William
Shadrick
Dye
76
76
6th Virginia Regiment of the Continental Line Revolutionary War Pension #8719 Halifax Militia, Virginia Betty Cochran, 13 Sep 1993, DAR research Ted Stout, 20 Jan 1998, email "Genealogical Abstracts of Revol War Pension Files: DYE, William, Sarah Reynolds former widow, R8719, VA Line, widow applied 17 Nov 1849 Pulaski Co, Ky aged 67, sol m Sarah Gorden of Caswell Co, NC on 6 June 1798 and sol d in 1823 & wid m next to Matthew Reynolds who d in Dec 1842, sol lived in Halifax Co, VA bef & aft the Rev War, sol's son Shadrack Dye was aged 69 in 1851 a res of Pulaski Co, Ky & stated he was present when his father m Sarah Gorden." The following information is from Mrs. Barbara Ann Renick, 311 Copa De Oro, Brea, CA 92621: Data from a fgs prepared by Bethel D. Strong. Hazel DICK SMITH sent me a photocopy of a typed page: "DYE, William (Sarah Reynolds, former widow). [number illegible]. 17 Nov. 1849. Pulaski Co., Ky. Sarah Reynolds of said county, aged 67, declares her maiden name was Sarah Gordon. She resided in Caswell Co., NC., and there on 16 June 1798 was married to William Dye by Archd. Samuel, a justice of the peace. She had a memorandum of her marriage in a Bible but she gave teh Bible to one of her sons who moved to Missouri and she supposes he took it with him. William Dye died in 1823. After that she married Matthew Reynolds, and he died six years ago Last December. William Dye stated he resided in Halifax Co., VA., and was in Gen. Greene's army and in the battle of Guildord. She thinks his captain's name at that battle was Thompson. She heard him speak of the battle of Brandywine but does not remember whether he was in that battle himself. He and John Yeates talked about the scenes of that battle as if they were both eye witnesses. He described the place where the battle commenced as being in an old field here an old apple orchard had been turned out and that there were gullies or drains where the battle was fought, that ran bith blood as the water would after a shower of rain. He said in the service he performed in augmenting Gen. Greene's army he was engaged about two weeks in marching through the country to Gen. Greene and then at night was marched back into the country to obtain more recruits. At the battle of Guilford his captain (Thompson) was killed and his colonel was badly wounded, shot through the thigh. She saw his discharge and a printed paper which purported to be his oath of allegiance. These two papers were burned. The night before they started from North Carolina to Kentucky her husband had a friend helping him to examine his) papers. They saved all the papers they thought would be of value to him and when they came to his discharge and oath of allegiance it was said he had better save them, but he said, No, he had kept them about twenty-five years and they never done him any good and they were cast into the fire with other useless papers. He stated he was at the siege of Yorktown at the close of the war. They Labored twenty-odd days and nights carrying forward the intrenchments. Washinton wrote a deceptive Letter designed to fall into the hands of the British and started the officer wtih it and the British took him prisoner and examined the Letter and were deecived by it as Washington designed. Her husband was present at the surrender of Corwallis and saw that officer came out and surrender his sword to Washington. He said Cornwallis walked up to where Washington stood and struck his sword in the ground near Washington. Washington took the sword and turned it about and looked at it and then handed it back to Cornwallis again. She resides ten miles from the Court House of her county and cannot go to the Courth House. She is afflicted with phthysick. 18 Aug. 1851. Pulaski Co., Ky Shaderach (X) Dye of said county, aged 69, declares he was present at the house of Polly Randal in Caswell Co., N.C. in June 1799 when the marriage ceremony was performed of William Dye to Sarah Gordin. She afterward married Matthew Reynolds. The ceremony was performed by a justice of the peace, Archd. Samuels. The affiant was a son of William Dye and heard him speak of his services in the Revolutionary War and recollects that the captain who commanded him at the battle of Guilford... (end of copy)." Received this in an email from Gaidurgis@aol.com or DoloresJG@aol.com: Hello Jim, I think I may have found something on your line.You said that"Charlotte Dye born 1836 had father William and mother Margaret (unknown)." Found in Pulaski Co. Ky marriages from 1820- 1830 Dye, William Peggy Phelps 13 Nov 1830 consent: Shadrick Dye] source:KARD files vol 23 published by John A Dye and Judy Dye ; submitter Yvonne Dickerson Did I send you info on the Kard files? A clearinghouse for Dye data. Your Dye family as far as I can tell is in their booklets as Branch #33 from Jacob b. ca 1700 VA had son William b. 1747 Halifax Co, VA d. 1823 Pulaski Co. Ky; m/1 Halifax Co.Va to Randolph (d/o James Jr and Mary Randolph) m/2nd 16 June 1799 Sarah Sally Gordon He sired 18 children as far as I can tell . Six children by 1st marriage..... Margaret Peggy b. 1770 Halifax Co. VA; d. 22 Feb 1833 m. 28 Dec 1796 Obediah Phelps was first child then Sarah Sally b 1772; Anna b 1776; Deliah b 16 Feb1779; Shadrick b. 1782 Halifax Co VA m. 26 Nov. 1802 Ellen Weley Six child was Katherine b 1788 Halifax Co VA Hope this helps you. If not right family please let me know....Peggy is sometimes a nickname for Margaret. E-mail me DoloresJG @aol.com and I'll see you again in chat LOL I am so very slow or so very busy..LOL on my researching.... This information is for his second marriage, I think: From Kentucky: A History of the State, Battle, Perrin, & Kniffin, 3rd ed., 1885, Hardin Co. DR. GEORGE W. WHITE, a prominent citizen of Elizabethtown, Hardin County, was born November 17, 1827; on Fishing Creek, Pulaski Co., Ky. His maternal grandfather was a soldier in the Revolutionary war from Virginia; married a lady named GORDON and reared a large family of children, one of whom was subject's mother. Thomas White, the father of subject, was born in North Carolina, and when eight years old, in company with his mother and stepfather, came to Kentucky, leaving the rest of his brothers in North Carolina. They located in Casey County, were Thomas grew to manhood, and where he married Miss Tabitha DYE. She was a native of Pulaski County, though of a Virginia family of German origin, and a daughter of a Revolutionary soldier. Thomas White devoted his life to farming and died in 1866. He had a family of fourteen sons and one daughter, several of whom grew to maturity. The mother still resides in Pulaski County, at the age of eighty-four years. Dr. George W. was the fourth son born to these parents. His boyhood days were passed on his father's farm, during which period he attended the common schools of his native county and the schools of Somerset. At the age of twenty-one years he began the study of medicine, meantime engaging in school teaching as a means of support while preparing for his profession. In 1852 he entered the medical department of the University of Louisville, graduating therefrom the following year, when he at once established a practice in Breckinridge County, where he had removed in early manhood. After a successful professional career of twenty years he retired from the practice and removed to Elizabethtown, Hardin County, Kentucky. The following information is from Mrs. Barbara Ann Renick, 311 Copa De Oro, Brea, CA 92621: Data from a fgs prepared by Bethel D. Strong. Hazel DICK SMITH sent me a photocopy of a typed page: "DYE, William (Sarah Reynolds, former widow). [number illegible]. 17 Nov. 1849. Pulaski Co., Ky. Sarah Reynolds of said county, aged 67, declares her maiden name was Sarah Gordon. She resided in Caswell Co., NC., and there on 16 June 1798 was married to William Dye by Archd. Samuel, a justice of the peace. She had a memorandum of her marriage in a Bible but she gave teh Bible to one of her sons who moved to Missouri and she supposes he took it with him. William Dye died in 1823. After that she married Matthew Reynolds, and he died six years ago Last December. William Dye stated he resided in Halifax Co., VA., and was in Gen. Greene's army and in the battle of Guildord. She thinks his captain's name at that battle was Thompson. She heard him speak of the battle of Brandywine but does not remember whether he was in that battle himself. He and John Yeates talked about the scenes of that battle as if they were both eye witnesses. He described the place where the battle commenced as being in an old field here an old apple orchard had been turned out and that there were gullies or drains where the battle was fought, that ran bith blood as the water would after a shower of rain. He said in the service he performed in augmenting Gen. Greene's army he was engaged about two weeks in marching through the country to Gen. Greene and then at night was marched back into the country to obtain more recruits. At the battle of Guilford his captain (Thompson) was killed and his colonel was badly wounded, shot through the thigh. She saw his discharge and a printed paper which purported to be his oath of allegiance. These two papers were burned. The night before they started from North Carolina to Kentucky her husband had a friend helping him to examine his) papers. They saved all the papers they thought would be of value to him and when they came to his discharge and oath of allegiance it was said he had better save them, but he said, No, he had kept them about twenty-five years and they never done him any good and they were cast into the fire with other useless papers. He stated he was at the siege of Yorktown at the close of the war. They Labored twenty-odd days and nights carrying forward the intrenchments. Washinton wrote a deceptive Letter designed to fall into the hands of the British and started the officer wtih it and the British took him prisoner and examined the Letter and were deecived by it as Washington designed. Her husband was present at the surrender of Corwallis and saw that officer came out and surrender his sword to Washington. He said Cornwallis walked up to where Washington stood and struck his sword in the ground near Washington. Washington took the sword and turned it about and looked at it and then handed it back to Cornwallis again. She resides ten miles from the Court House of her county and cannot go to the Courth House. She is afflicted with phthysick. 18 Aug. 1851. Pulaski Co., Ky Shaderach (X) Dye of said county, aged 69, declares he was present at the house of Polly Randal in Caswell Co., N.C. in June 1799 when the marriage ceremony was performed of William Dye to Sarah Gordin. She afterward married Matthew Reynolds. The ceremony was performed by a justice of the peace, Archd. Samuels. The affiant was a son of William Dye and heard him speak of his services in the Revolutionary War and recollects that the captain who commanded him at the battle of Guilford... (end of copy)."
D. 1788
Rebecca
Randolph
1772 - UNKNOWN
Sarah
"Sally"
Dye
1770 - 1833
Margaret
"Peggy"
Dye
63
63
1776 - UNKNOWN
Anna J.
"Polly"
Dye
1788 - 1872
Catherine
Dye
84
84
1782 - 1852
Sarah
"Sally"
Gordon
70
70
17 NOV 1849: VIRGINIA REVOLUTIONARY PENSION APPLICATIONS by John Frederick Dorman, Vol. 32, page 44-45. "DYE, William (Sarah Reynolds, former widow). R8719. 17 Nov. 1849. Pulaski Co., Ky. Sarah Reynolds of said county, aged 67, declares her maiden name was Sarah Gordon. She resided in Caswell Co., N.C., and there on 16 June 1798 was married to William Dye by Archd. Samuel, a justice of the peace. She had a memorandum of her marriage in a Bible but she gave the Bible to one of her sons who moved to Missouri and she supposes he took it with him. William Dye died in 1823. After that she married Matthew Reynolds, and he died six years ago last December. William Dye stated he resided in Halifax Co., VA and was in Gen. Greene's army and in the battle of Guilford. She thinks his captain's name at that battle was Thompson. She heard him speak of the battle of Brandywine but does not remember whether he was in that battle himself. He and John Yeates talked about the scenes of that battle as if they were both eye witnesses. He described the place where the battle commenced as being in an old field where an old apple orchard had been turned out and that there were gullies or drains where the battle was fought, that ran with blood as the water would after a shower of rain. He said in the service he performed in augmenting Gen. Greene's army he was engaged about two weeks in marching through the country to Gen. Greene and then at night was marched back in to the country to obtain more recruits. At the battle of Guilford his captain (Thompson) was killed and his colonel was badly wounded, shot through the thigh. She saw his discharge and a printed paper which purported to be his oath of allegiance. These two papers were burned. The night before they started from North Carolina to Kentucky her husband had a friend helping him to examine his papers. They saved all the papers they thought would be of value to him and when they came to his discharge and oath of allegiance it was siad he had better save them, but he said, No, he had kept them about twenty-five years and they had never done him any good and they were cast into the fire with the other useless papers. He stated he was at the siege of Yorktown at the close of the war. They labored twenty-odd days and nights carrying forward the entrenchments. Washington wrote a deceptive letter designed to fall into the hands of the British and started the officer with it and the British took him prisoner and examined the letter and were deceived by it as Washington designed. Her husband was present at the surrender of Cornwallis and saw that officer come out and surrender his sword to Washington. He said Cornwallis walked up to where Washington stood and struck his sword into the ground near Washington. Washington took his sword and turned it about and looked at it and then handed it back to Cornwallis again. She resides ten miles from the Court House of her county and cannot go to the Court House. She is afflicted with phthysick. 18 Aug. 1851. Pulaski Co., Ky. Shaderach (X) Dye of said county, aged 69, declares he was present at the house of Polly Randal in Caswell Co., N.C., in June 1799 when the marriage ceremony was performed of William Dye to Sarah Gordin. She was afterward married to Matthew Reynolds. The marriage was performed by a justice of the peace, Archd. Samuels. The affiant was a son of William Dye and heard him speak of his services in the Revolutionary War and recollects that the captain who commanded him at the battle of Guilford was named Thompson. William Dye said he was killed in the battle."
1818 - UNKNOWN
Mary F.
"Polly"
Randolph
1819 - UNKNOWN
Mary
Jellico
Randolph
1776 - 1810
Obediah
Phelps
34
34
1839 - 1909
Joshua
Taylor
Wesley
69
69
1753 - UNKNOWN
Mary
"Polly"
Dye
Source: Randolph Newsletter Volume 1 Issue 4 Fall 1999 Marriage Bond for James Randolph and Mary Dye Know all men by these presents that we James Randolph and David Shelton are held and firmly bound unto his honor Alexander Martin, Captain Governor for the time being in the sum of fifty poinds specie to be paid to the said Alexander Martin, Esq. his superiors in office, to which payment is well and truly made we bind ourselves our heirs executors and severally joyntly firmly by these presents seald with our seals. Dated this 12th Day of December 1781. The Condition of the above obligation is such that whereas James Randolph the day of the date of these presents obtained a license to be joyned in hold wedlock with Mary Dye. And if there be no lawful impediment why the said James Randolph and Mary Dye should not be joyned in holy matrimony then the above obligation shall be void otherwise to remain in full force and effect. JAMES X RANDOLPH HIS MARK SEAL SEALD & DELIVERED In Presence of David Shelton, Murphey A. J. SEAL
1786 - 1863
John
Randolph
76
76
D. UNKNOWN
Jeremiah
Randolph
1835 - 1912
Delila
Wesley
76
76
1837 - 1909
Lydia
"Liddie"
Wesley
72
72
1841
George
Wesley
1843 - 1901
James
Wesley
58
58
1845 - 1878
Green
Berry
Wesley
33
33
1847 - 1900
Shadrack
Wesley
53
53
1850 - 1922
Louisa
"Luce"
Wesley
71
71
1856 - UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Wesley
1857 - UNKNOWN
Jeremiah
"Jerry"
Wesley
1837 - UNKNOWN
Eleanor
Dye
1843
Susannah
June
Dye
1846 - 1914
Sarah
Jane
Dye
67
67
1831 - UNKNOWN
Lemont
Dye
1846 - 1924
Nancy
"Pet"
Wesley
78
78
1876 - UNKNOWN
Millard
Filmore
Wesley
1727 - 1789
Mary
Elizabeth
Brown
62
62
1807 - UNKNOWN
Tinsel
Dye
1807 - UNKNOWN
William
Dye
1808 - UNKNOWN
Susannah
Dye
1809 - UNKNOWN
Jacob
Alexander
Dye
1810 - UNKNOWN
Plesant
Dye
1812 - UNKNOWN
Elender
Dye
1816 - UNKNOWN
Charles
Goodall
Dye
1823 - UNKNOWN
Shadrack
Blevins
Dye
1808 - UNKNOWN
Isaac
Dye
D. UNKNOWN
Matilda
Gaddis
1803 - UNKNOWN
Tabitha
Dye
1806 - UNKNOWN
Nancy
Dye
1811 - 1866
Jinsey
A.
Dye
55
55
1815 - 1900
James
L. Dye
84
84
D. UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Dye
D. UNKNOWN
Fanny
Dye
1822 - 1871
Sarah
"Sally"
Morning Dye
49
49
1819 - UNKNOWN
John
Oliver
Ashley
D. UNKNOWN
Rachel
Kelly
1810 - 1887
Alexander
S.
Irvin
77
77
1831 - UNKNOWN
Andrew
J Dye
D. UNKNOWN
Polly
A.
Dye
D. UNKNOWN
Sally
J. Dye
D. UNKNOWN
Malissa
Dye
D. UNKNOWN
Artemisa
"Minnie"
Dye
D. UNKNOWN
Newton
J. Dye
1804 - 1880
Elizabeth
"Betsey"
Watson
76
76
D. UNKNOWN
Ann
Dye
D. UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Dye
D. UNKNOWN
Jacob
Dye
1761 - UNKNOWN
James
Brown
Dye
1818 - UNKNOWN
Obediah
Phelps
Census: 1850 Pulaski Co. KY Occupation: 1850 Farmer Title: Jim Harlan - JHarlan1@Juno.com Repository: Call Number: Media: Book Page: 1850 Pulaski Co. Census
D. UNKNOWN
James
Calvary
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Delia
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Nimrod
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Guiara
"Guy"
Wesley
1848 - 1922
Katherine
"Kate"
Wesley
73
73
1849 - UNKNOWN
Thomas
Wesley
1852 - 1917
Matilda
"Tilda"
Wesley
65
65
1857 - UNKNOWN
Sarenia
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Mary
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Frances
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Green
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Emily
Burton
1875 - 1921
Ghira "Guy"
Montgomery
Wesley
46
46
1849 - UNKNOWN
William
Bill M
Spears
D. UNKNOWN
Ambrose
Phelps
D. UNKNOWN
Scinthia
Phelps
1801 - 1855
Cabrid
Phelps
53
53
1773 - UNKNOWN
Larkin
Phelps
1807 - 1870
Sarah
"Sally"
Jones
63
63
1820 - UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
"Betsey"
Wesley
1821 - 1879
Vincent
Green
Wesley
57
57
The Casey County Tornado of the year 1878: Retyped from a retype by Chester Ware, The story originally published in the Casey County news many years ago: On the 2nd day of March, 1878, there were two storms raging in the Gilpin section of Casey County, one on the north side of Jonothan Fork and the other on the south side of Jonothan Fork. They came together about the head of the creek and formed a tornado which wwept everything in its path as it traveled at a terrific speed. The first building of any note in the path of the storm was a cabin in which James Lawless and family lived. It took the top off this building and passed on to the home of Vinson G Wesley, where Mr. Wesley and wife, Peg, as she was familiarly known, Bell and ann, two daughters, also V. Green Richardson, Johnson Sloan and William Taylor, a brother of Mrs. Wesley, were sitting around in the kitchen after having eaten dinner. Hearing a stormcoming they went into the front room, which was larger and all managed to get into the front room except Mr. Richardson, who saw rails, boards and lumber flying in the air as he reached the door and turned back into the kitchen, as there was an open passway between the kitchen and the front room. He saw the top of the kitchen and the walls blown away down to the floor and that was the last he knew until he came to himself under a lot of logs. He attempted to extricate himself but found that he was held fast. About this time there came another gust of wind and the logs were blown away. He got up and looked around but could not see the house or barn and said for a few minutes he did not know whether he was in another world or not. By this time the neighbors had begun to gather and he was taken in charge. The body of uncle Vince was found inside the yard with one arm cut off and a wall of the house was lying on top of him. The girls were all dead. The body of Aunt Peg was found about a quarter of a mile away. All her clothes were stripped from her. Her underskirt which was made of lindsey was found about seven mules away on the Elliott place. Some of the wuilts that were blown from the bed were also found near the body. It has always been thought that Aunt Peg and the bed were taken up in the "funnel" of the tornado as Aunt Peg would always run and get in bed in time of a storm, as there was an old saying that feathers were a non-conductor of lightning. The house was built of logs and they were scattered for a quarter of a mile. One of the logs was carried about a quarter of a mile and driven into the ground six or seven feet. There was a beech tree standing near the spring that was about 16 inches in diameter and it was some 12 or 14 feet to the first limb. The wind twisted it around, until it was a bundle of splinters, but the roots remained intact. The barn was also built of logs, but the floor was about three feet above the ground, this space used for a sheep house, then the walls were built on top of this floor. A shed was built all around and stalls were in this shed. The stock must have all been in or around the barn when the storm struck as they were found nearby all dead except the sheep which were in the sheep house. All the barn was blown away except the sheep house part. A five dollar bill was found hanging on a briar in perfect condition. The tornado passed through the Mt. Olive section, tearing down fences, uprooting trees and the dwelling of Dr. Sherd McClure was moved a few inches from its foundatin. The age of the victims were: Vinson G. Wesley 57 years Margaret (Peg) Wesley 53 years Elizabeth Ann Wesley 25 years Martha Bell Wesley 17 years By J.B. Wesley Bethelridge, KY. from the Edwin H. Wesley collection.
1822 - UNKNOWN
Guyra
"Guy"
Wesley
1823 - UNKNOWN
Delia
Jane
Wesley
1824 - 1897
George
Taylor"Big
Geo" Wesley
72
72
1826 - UNKNOWN
Lydia
Wesley
1828 - UNKNOWN
Rebecca
Wesley
1831 - UNKNOWN
Robin
"Robert"
Wesley
1833 - 1833
Caleb
Wesley
1834 - 1887
Joshua F.
"Piddle Josh"
Wesley
52
52
1836 - 1920
Josiah
"Joe"
Wesley
83
83
1837 - 1913
Katherine
"Kate"
Wesley
76
76
D. UNKNOWN
John
Holman
Wesley
1844 - UNKNOWN
Amon
Wesley
Twin of Susie
1844 - 1844
Susie
Mae
Wesley
Twin of Amon
D. UNKNOWN
Charlotte
"Lotty"
Taylor
D. UNKNOWN
Martha Jane
"Patsy"
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Mary Elizabeth
"Bettie"
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Peggy
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Emily
Wesley
1856 - UNKNOWN
Lemont
"Lee"
Wesley
1795 - 1853
Margaret
Peggy
Dick
57
57
1825 - UNKNOWN
Fanny
Wesley
1827 - UNKNOWN
Delilia
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Sarah
Wesley
1831 - UNKNOWN
Mary
"Pop"
Wesley
1834 - 1904
John "Tater
John"
Wesley
69
69
1837 - 1914
Christine
Elizabeth
"Shannie" Wesley
77
77
1839 - UNKNOWN
Nancy
Wesley
1841 - UNKNOWN
Lydia
Jane Ann
Wesley
1847 - 1892
Robert
"Robin"
Wesley
45
45
1838 - UNKNOWN
Nimrod
Godbey
D. UNKNOWN
Henry
Harrison
Godbey
D. UNKNOWN
Maryan
Dungan
1788 - 1871
Sarah R.
"Sally"
Curles
83
83
1807 - UNKNOWN
Payton
Randolph
1810 - UNKNOWN
Alexander
Randolph
1813 - 1874
Nancy
Randolph
61
61
1815 - 1905
Mary
Randolph
90
90
1817 - 1877
John
Randolph
60
60
1819 - 1918
Morris
Randolph
98
98
1821 - 1863
Sophia
Randolph
41
41
1824 - 1909
Jeremiah
M.
Randolph
85
85
1825 - 1918
Joseph
Randolph
92
92
1829 - 1907
Samuel
Randolph
78
78
D. UNKNOWN
Polly
Sloan
1817 - UNKNOWN
Tabitha
Gover
D. UNKNOWN
Allen
Hargis
D. UNKNOWN
Barbara
Ann
Krise
D. UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Langdon
D. UNKNOWN
Amanda
Bradley
D. UNKNOWN
Rachel
Gastineau
1817 - UNKNOWN
Milton
Green
Sewell
1826 - UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Bullock
D. UNKNOWN
Nancy
Jane
Rash
D. UNKNOWN
Levica
Carroll
Warren
D. UNKNOWN
Elzira
F.
Spears
1830 - UNKNOWN
Rachel
Gastineau
D. UNKNOWN
Harriett
Ashurst
1856 - UNKNOWN
James
T.
Randolph
D. UNKNOWN
Mary
Margaret
Randolph
D. UNKNOWN
Martha
Randolph
D. UNKNOWN
Payton
Randolph
D. UNKNOWN
Mary
Helen
Randolph
1859 - UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Ann
Randolph
D. UNKNOWN
Joe
Price
D. UNKNOWN
Peter
Price
1834 - 1885
James
Hamilton
Adams
51
51
D. UNKNOWN
Sarah
G.
Irvin
1861 - UNKNOWN
Eliza
Jane
Carter
1859 - UNKNOWN
Robert
Alexander
Blevins
1881 - UNKNOWN
Balzora
Catherine
Blevins
1876 - UNKNOWN
Armstrong
Dick
Carrie
Vandalie
Dick
Luellen
Dick
Henry
Durbin
Dick
Leeroy
Thomas
Dick
William
Garfield
Dick
Raymond
Oake
Dick
Sarah
Belle
Dick
Roseada
Dick
Robert
Lonzo
Dick
Eiza
Rosco
Dick
Mary
Eliza
Dick
Napolean
Bonaparte
Roy
Loyd
Vaught
Jordan
Roy
1885 - 1944
Millard
Fillmore
Dick
58
58
1857
George
G.
Dick
From the 1910 census: Dick, Geo Feb. 1857 Ky Cartherine Sep. 1863 Ky Abraham G. Jan 1883 Ky Willard F. Jan 1885 Ky Geo. G. Feb 1 887 Ky Robert A. Jan 1889 Ky Newte T. Mar 1894 Ky Nancy C. Jan 1897 Ky
1863
Catherine
1820 - 1877
Green
Berry
N. Dick
57
57
Info from the 1870 Pulaski County Kentucky census record book page 146, household number 15: Dick, Green B. 50 M Farmer 857 Ky Sarah 48 F Ky Nancy J. 20 F Ky Wm M. 18 M Ky Robert J. 16 M Ky George G. 13 M Ky Mary E. 11 F Ky James A. 7 M Ky Thomas 5 M Ky Sarah M. 3 F Ky From the 1850 Pulaski County, Kentucky census page 213 Dictrict 2 Household Number 598: Dick, Berry 30 M Farmer Ky Sarah 24 F Ky Katharine 3 F Ky Nancy J. 1 F Ky
1829 - UNKNOWN
Sarah
"Sally"
Spears
1806 - 1897
Hezekiah
"Ki"
Spears
91
91
1806 - UNKNOWN
Catherine
"Caty"
Wesley
1839 - 1897
Seralda
Hinds
58
58
1870 - 1954
Ephraim
Franklin
Wesley
83
83
1857 - UNKNOWN
John
Bruce
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Catherine
Deboard
1871 - 1953
Sarah
Ann
Hinds
82
82
1833 - UNKNOWN
William
H.
Spaw
1840 - UNKNOWN
Martha
A
Spaw
D. UNKNOWN
Polly
Whitaker
1863 - UNKNOWN
Pheby
C
Blevins
1883 - UNKNOWN
Mary
Elizabeth
Blevins
1886 - UNKNOWN
John
Abe
Blevins
1888 - UNKNOWN
Sarah
Ellen
Blevins
1891 - UNKNOWN
William
Sherman
Blevins
1893 - UNKNOWN
Malinda
Isabelle
Blevins
1895 - UNKNOWN
Lue
Wilmerth
Blevins
1897 - UNKNOWN
Columbus
Blevins
D. UNKNOWN
Maggie
Dick
D. UNKNOWN
Percilla
Dick
D. UNKNOWN
Flossie
Shadson
D. UNKNOWN
Josh
Dick
D. UNKNOWN
Lue
Dick
D. UNKNOWN
Margaret
"Martha"
Peggy Phelps
Census: 1870 Pulaski Co. KY Married: 13 NOV 1830 in Pulaski Co. KY, Marriage Records, 1797-1850, Pg. 65 Title: Jim Harlan - JHarlan1@Juno.com Repository: Call Number: Media: Book Page: 1850 Pulaski Co. Census, name shown as Martha
1857 - 1931
James
William Jim
Bill Wesley
73
73
1860 - 1935
Mary
Jones Polly
Godbey
75
75
1830 - UNKNOWN
Nicholas
J.
Spears
1834 - UNKNOWN
Mary
Martha C
Spears
1837 - 1852
Elizabeth
Spears
15
15
1840 - UNKNOWN
Delila
Mary Polly
Spears
1844 - 1852
Lydia
J.
Spears
8
8
1849 - 1860
Thomas
Spears
11
11
1825 - UNKNOWN
Sarah
Jane
Moore
1844 - UNKNOWN
Thomas
Davenport
Dick
1833 - UNKNOWN
Abraham
Price
Blevins
D. UNKNOWN
Eulie
E.
Pittman
D. UNKNOWN
James
Spears
1861 - 1945
Paradine
Dye
84
84
1850 - UNKNOWN
Hezekiah
H K
Spears
1852 - 1874
Joseph
Spears
21
21
1854 - UNKNOWN
John J
Spears
1855 - UNKNOWN
Cyrenius
Spears
1857 - UNKNOWN
Catherine
Serena
Spears
1859 - UNKNOWN
Travis
Green
Spears
1861 - 1922
Jeremiah
Jerry
Spears
60
60
D. UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Spears
1858 - UNKNOWN
Stephen
Caldwell
Sweet
1867 - UNKNOWN
Etta
Roberts
1848 - UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Sweet
1861 - UNKNOWN
Nancy
Jane Belle
Sweet
D. UNKNOWN
Rebecca
Brown
Wesley
1854
John
Martin
Deboard
1853 - 1939
Maud
"Meania"
Jones
85
85
1877 - 1940
Matilda
Catherine
"Cath" Spears
62
62
1895 - UNKNOWN
James
William "Will"
Wesley
1897 - UNKNOWN
Mitchell
Wesley
Liddie
"Lid"
Wesley
Simon
Garfield
"Sim" Wesley
Dealy
"Deal"
Wesley
Oliver
Wesley
1892 - UNKNOWN
Louanne
Jane
Spears
Mose
Martin
1804 - UNKNOWN
John
Henry
Dye
1825 - UNKNOWN
William
Harrison
Dye
1827 - UNKNOWN
Nancy
Dye
1828 - UNKNOWN
Shadrick
Dye
1828 - UNKNOWN
Albin
Thomas
Dye
1831 - UNKNOWN
Bartherman
Dye
1834 - UNKNOWN
Cyrus
Green
Dye
1838 - 1898
Rachel
Serelda
Emerline Dye
59
59
1837 - UNKNOWN
Beverely
Lemon
Spaw
1840 - 1909
Isaiah
Clifton
Dye
68
68
1845 - UNKNOWN
Julia A
Dye
1834 - UNKNOWN
William
Spaw
D. UNKNOWN
Obediah
Ashely
D. UNKNOWN
Nancy
Ann
McGowan
D. UNKNOWN
Eliza
Amanda
Hammond
D. UNKNOWN
Jesse
Eden
D. UNKNOWN
Martha
D. UNKNOWN
Sarah
Sloan
D. UNKNOWN
Pricella
D. UNKNOWN
Martha
Moore
D. UNKNOWN
Wilford
Taylor
"Wig" Dye
D. UNKNOWN
Matilda
Phelps
Title: Shirley Larson, turtledean@cisnet.com Repository: Call Number: Media: Book Page: 1850 Pulaski Co. Census
1800 - UNKNOWN
Freeman
Killingsworth
Phelps
1803 - UNKNOWN
Robert
Phelps
1806 - UNKNOWN
Catherine
Phelps
1807 - UNKNOWN
Levina
Phelps
1808 - UNKNOWN
Pernetta
Phelps
Census: 1870 Pulaski Co. KY, name listed as Permelta
1810 - UNKNOWN
Vincent
Green
Phelps
1815 - UNKNOWN
Mahulda
Phelps
1805 - UNKNOWN
Lorenzo
Dow
Phelps
Census: 1870 Pulaski Co. KY, land value $600. Census: 1850 Pulaski Co. KY, name listed as Rowrenza Occupation: 1870 Farmer
1817 - UNKNOWN
Charlotte
Jane
Phelps
D. UNKNOWN
Timothy
Ruark
Title: Jim Harlan - JHarlan1@Juno.com Repository: Call Number: Media: Book
1808 - UNKNOWN
Thomas
Stewart
Clark
Married: 31 JAN 1832 in Pulaski Co. KY, Marriage Records, 1797-1850, Pg. 58 Title: 1870 Census Pulaski Co., KY Repository: Call Number: Media: Book
D. UNKNOWN
Mary
Burkett
D. UNKNOWN
Sarah
Brinson
D. UNKNOWN
Susan
Whitson
1814 - UNKNOWN
William
Dick
Title: Jim Harlan - JHarlan1@Juno.com Repository: Call Number: Media: Book
1843 - UNKNOWN
Mary
J.
Meeks
1866 - UNKNOWN
Mary
E
Wesley
1868 - UNKNOWN
Ermeld
F
Wesley
1871 - UNKNOWN
Maggie
E
Wesley
1874 - UNKNOWN
Paschal
S
Wesley
1877 - UNKNOWN
John
W
Wesley
1877 - UNKNOWN
Martha
J
Cooper
1853 - 1924
Gilla M
Whiles
71
71
D. UNKNOWN
Andrew
James
Whiles
1818 - UNKNOWN
Linsey
Bailey
Whiles
1850 - UNKNOWN
George
S
Whiles
1848 - UNKNOWN
Pheby
Ann
Whiles
1845 - UNKNOWN
Nancy
Elizabeth
Whiles
1842 - UNKNOWN
Thomas
Jefferson
Whiles
1840 - UNKNOWN
Johnson
Whiles
1838 - UNKNOWN
Patience
C
Black
1838 - UNKNOWN
Scynthia
Whiles
1834 - UNKNOWN
Calvin
Whiles
1832 - UNKNOWN
Nety
Whiles
1879 - UNKNOWN
Andrew
J
Blevins
1847 - UNKNOWN
Katherine
Dick
1850 - UNKNOWN
Nancy
J Dick
1847 - 1916
Martha
Dye
69
69
1874 - UNKNOWN
Arra B
Wesley
1880 - UNKNOWN
Drew
Melvin
Wesley
1889 - UNKNOWN
Mack
Wesley
1892 - UNKNOWN
Taylor
Wesley
1895 - UNKNOWN
Etta
Elizabeth
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Stacy
Wesley
D. UNKNOWN
Milford
Eubank
1844 - UNKNOWN
Cora
Spears
D. UNKNOWN
Jennie
Adams
D. UNKNOWN
Maude
Dick
D. UNKNOWN
Thomas
Anthony
Ashley
1897 - UNKNOWN
Estel
Godby
1874 - 1947
Mary
Susan
Wesley
72
72
1872 - 1946
James Martin
"Bose"
Spears
74
74
1872 - 1924
John
James
Spears
52
52
D. UNKNOWN
Ada
Ellen
Burton
1896 - UNKNOWN
Theodore "Theo"
Richardson
Spears
Ruby
Catherine
Wesley
1825 - UNKNOWN
Logan
Dick
1828 - UNKNOWN
Elsey
Dick
1830 - UNKNOWN
Nancy
G Dick
1834 - UNKNOWN
Delila
Dick
1835 - UNKNOWN
James
W
Dick
1837 - UNKNOWN
Katherine
Dick
1838 - UNKNOWN
John
C Dick
D. UNKNOWN
Jackson
Howell
1841 - 1917
William
David
Ashley
75
75
1840 - UNKNOWN
Martha
Ellen
Staten
1845 - 1926
James
King
Ashley
81
81
1852 - UNKNOWN
America
Jones
1847 - UNKNOWN
Uriah
Ashley
1849 - UNKNOWN
Martha
Ashley
1851 - UNKNOWN
Elias
W
Ashley
1853 - UNKNOWN
Sarah
G
Ashley
1855 - UNKNOWN
Robert
Ashley
1857 - UNKNOWN
Mary
Ashley
1859 - UNKNOWN
Minverva
B
Ashley
1852 - UNKNOWN
William
M Dick
1854 - UNKNOWN
Robert
J Dick
1859 - UNKNOWN
Mary
E Dick
1863 - UNKNOWN
James
A Dick
1865 - UNKNOWN
Thomas
Dick
1867 - UNKNOWN
Sarah
M Dick
1859 - UNKNOWN
Newton
Jasper
D. UNKNOWN
Viletta
Roberts
1839 - UNKNOWN
Lincoln
Logan
Roberts
1824 - 1916
Sarah
Jane
Lawhorn
92
92
Sally was named in the will of Benjamin F Lawhorn as an heir in Casey County Kentucky. She was named as an heir on the commissioners deed for Benjamin B Lawhorn in Casey County
1849 - UNKNOWN
Amanda
Francis
Wesley
1860 - 1933
Sciotha
Wesley
72
72
1852 - UNKNOWN
Margaret
Wesley
1854 - UNKNOWN
Aley
Ann
Wesley
1854 - UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Lydia
Wesley
1859 - UNKNOWN
John
Gilford
Wesley
1861 - 1881
Rebecca
J
Wesley
20
20
D. UNKNOWN
George
W
Thomas
D. UNKNOWN
Vileta
Taylor
1864
James
D Hall
1883
Abraham
S. G.
Dick
1887
George
G.
Dick
1889
Robert
A.
Dick
1834
Jane
Wesley
1844 - 1918
James
King
Wesley
74
74
1839
Francis
S
Irvine
Betty
Cochran
1811
Susan
Jasper
Spears
1831
Achilles
Dye
Ruth
Higgins
1856
Elizabeth
Smiley
Dye
Elizabeth
Dye
Betsy
Clara
Yates
1858 - 1917
Mary
Jane
Wesley
58
58
Silas
Bruce
Jones
Samantha
Ann
Rogers
Siotha
Higgins
1825 - 1878
Margaret
"Peg"
Taylor
53
53
William
Hines
Ruben
Richardson
1842 - 1884
Sarah
Ann
Tilford
41
41
1839 - 1906
James
Richardson
67
67
Sally
Richardson
1898 - 1962
Sam P
Jones
64
64
Docta
Alma
Wesley
1873 - 1938
Henderson
L
Wesley
64
64
Fannie
Perkins
1868 - 1959
Lydia
"Liddie"
Wesley
90
90
1854 - 1937
William
Christopher
Andrew
82
82
1878 - 1958
Meck
Devera
Jones
79
79
1863 - 1881
Sarah
U
Wesley
18
18
James
Perry
Kelsay
1866 - 1944
Siotha
Wesley
78
78
James
H
Dudley
Jack
Marshall
1781 - 1864
Moses
Black
83
83
29 APR 1812: PULASKI CO KY MARRIAGE BOND : Moses Black and Calib Ramsey post bond on 29 APR 1812 for upcoming marriage between "Moses Black & Catherine Dye both of the county of Pulaski..."
Eli
Godbey
1854 - 1934
Ibby
Haynes
Godbey
79
79
1861 - 1910
Nancy
Godbey
48
48
1862
Henry
Harrison
Haggard
1888 - 1952
Amon
Firch
Jones
64
64
Hester
Susan
Quinton
Thomas
White
Hiram
Edwards
Andrew
Sloan
Thomas
Sadler
Asa
Brack
Jacob
Dye
1770
William
Abraham
Dye
1852
Sarah
Harlan
1858 - 1926
George
Gailine
Spaw
67
67
1864 - 1937
Margaret
Dora
Hampton
73
73
1888 - 1986
Callie
Kate
Spaw
97
97
1880 - 1947
Stephen
Wallace
Dunagan
66
66
1867 - 1947
Edmonia
Dye
80
80
Jeremiah
Moore
1882
Martha
Spears
John
Lay
1849
Josephine
McDaniel
John L
Dye
1870
Martha
Catherine
Spears
1867 - 1939
Elbert L.
"Bone"
Barber
72
72
John
Smith
Selesta
1807
Sarah
Barber
1848 - 1908
James
King
Wesley
60
60
Mariah
Cox
1849
Edmond
T
Wesley
Catherine
Meeks
1851
William
Green
Wesley
Sarah
Godby
1810 - UNKNOWN
Shadric
Wesley
Listed as Free Inhabitant in 1850 Census Excerpt from Federalist Papers No. 42 by James Madison http://madison.thefreelibrary.com/Federalist-Papers-Authored-by-James-Madison/1-8 The regulation of commerce with the Indian tribes is very properly unfettered from two limitations in the articles of Confederation, which render the provision obscure and contradictory. The power is there restrained to Indians, not members of any of the States, and is not to violate or infringe the legislative right of any State within its own limits. What description of Indians are to be deemed members of a State, is not yet settled, and has been a question of frequent perplexity and contention in the federal councils. And how the trade with Indians, though not members of a State, yet residing within its legislative jurisdiction, can be regulated by an external authority, without so far intruding on the internal rights of legislation, is absolutely incomprehensible. This is not the only case in which the articles of Confederation have inconsiderately endeavored to accomplish impossibilities; to reconcile a partial sovereignty in the Union, with complete sovereignty in the States; to subvert a mathematical axiom, by taking away a part, and letting the whole remain. The dissimilarity in the rules of naturalization has long been remarked as a fault in our system, and as laying a foundation for intricate and delicate questions. In the fourth article of the Confederation, it is declared "that the FREE INHABITANTS of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice, excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of FREE CITIZENS in the several States; and THE PEOPLE of each State shall, in every other, enjoy all the privileges of trade and commerce," etc. There is a confusion of language here, which is remarkable. Why the terms FREE INHABITANTS are used in one part of the article, FREE CITIZENS in another, and PEOPLE in another; or what was meant by superadding to "all privileges and immunities of free citizens," "all the privileges of trade and commerce," cannot easily be determined. It seems to be a construction scarcely avoidable, however, that those who come under the denomination of FREE INHABITANTS of a State, although not citizens of such State, are entitled, in every other State, to all the privileges of FREE CITIZENS of the latter; that is, to greater privileges than they may be entitled to in their own State: so that it may be in the power of a particular State, or rather every State is laid under a necessity, not only to confer the rights of citizenship in other States upon any whom it may admit to such rights within itself, but upon any whom it may allow to become inhabitants within its jurisdiction. But were an exposition of the term "inhabitants" to be admitted which would confine the stipulated privileges to citizens alone, the difficulty is diminished only, not removed. The very improper power would still be retained by each State, of naturalizing aliens in every other State. In one State, residence for a short term confirms all the rights of citizenship: in another, qualifications of greater importance are required. An alien, therefore, legally incapacitated for certain rights in the latter, may, by previous residence only in the former, elude his incapacity; and thus the law of one State be preposterously rendered paramount to the law of another, within the jurisdiction of the other. We owe it to mere casualty, that very serious embarrassments on this subject have been hitherto escaped. By the laws of several States, certain descriptions of aliens, who had rendered themselves obnoxious, were laid under interdicts inconsistent not only with the rights of citizenship but with the privilege of residence. What would have been the consequence, if such persons, by residence or otherwise, had acquired the character of citizens under the laws of another State, and then asserted their rights as such, both to residence and citizenship, within the State proscribing them? Whatever the legal consequences might have been, other consequences would probably have resulted, of too serious a nature not to be provided against. The new Constitution has accordingly, with great propriety, made provision against them, and all others proceeding from the defect of the Confederation on this head, by authorizing the general government to establish a uniform rule of naturalization throughout the United States. Excerpt from Founders Constitution http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a4_2_1s17.html In the fourth Article it was agreed, the better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the several States in this Union, that "the free inhabitants of each of these States,--paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice excepted,--shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; The word "citizen" imports the same as the word "freeman" in our old Acts of Assembly; and means every white man, who, by birth or naturalization, is or may be qualified to exercise and enjoy, under like circumstances, all the rights which any native born, white inhabitant of the State does or can enjoy. And every white man, born or naturalized in any other State, is such a citizen of such other State as to be entitled, in this State, to all the civil rights of citizenship, and by residence and other qualifications to all the political rights. Following comes from <http://www.aagsnc.org/columns/mar99col.htm> -- Buffalo Ridge Cherokee - Remnants of a Nation Divided According to tradition, the Allegeni, the ancestors of the modern Cherokee, were defeated by the Delaware-Iroquois alliance and moved into Virginia. The settled in New Holston Valley after residing for a period of time at the Peaks of Otter in Bedford County 4(Johnson, 34). In just twenty years, from 1880 to 1900, the Indians in Amherst County were systematically erased from the record books by the stroke of a pen. They were forced by law in 1705 to be called "mulatto" and then called "black" in 1900. Many of the Cherokee descendants of Amherst County accepted this term without resistance. In fact, by 1850, as "Free Inhabitants" of Amherst County, the Cherokee families lived in the communities with blacks and whites and many of the families "went" for black or white, depending on the racial community in which they lived and felt secure ( p. 37).
1839 - 1910
William
Wesley
70
70
Civil War Veteran, Co. F, 1st Regiment, Kentucky Cavalry, Union Army 1880 United States Census Household: Name Relation Marital Status Gender Race Age Birthplace Occupation Father's Birthplace Mother's Birthplace William WESLEY Self M Male W 41 KY Farmer KY KY Nancy A. WESLEY Wife M Female W 41 KY Keeping House KY KY Sciota WESLEY Dau S Female W 19 KY At Home KY KY Sarah J. WESLEY Dau S Female W 17 KY At Home KY KY Laura E. WESLEY Dau S Female W 14 KY At Home KY KY Luvina WESLEY Dau S Female W 12 KY At Home KY KY Ellen WESLEY Dau S Female W 9 KY KY KY Lydia S. WESLEY Dau S Female W 7 KY KY KY Freeman K. WESLEY Son S Male W 5 KY KY KY Belle WESLEY Dau S Female W 1 KY KY KY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Source Information: Census Place District 2 And 3, Pulaski, Kentucky Family History Library Film 1254440 NA Film Number T9-0440 Page Number 64C
1839 - 1920
Nancy
Ann
Dye
81
81
1811 - 1856
Archibald
Dick
45
45
Appears on Pulaski County 1850 Census District #2 Archibald Dick 38 M Farmer $700 KY Sarah 30 F KY Elizabeth 16 F KY Frances 14 F KY Green B 12 M KY Delila J 10 F KY John 8 M KY Robert 6 M KY Samuel 4 M KY James 2 M KY From the 1860 Pulaski County Kentucky census, Dictrict 1, done 17 Aug 1860 Post office Somerset, page 421, household number 1869, family number 1808: Sarah Dick 45 Female Farmer 600 300 Ky Francis 22 Male Farmer Ky John 18 Male Farmer Ky went to school Marshall 15 Male Farmer Ky went to school Samuel 13 Male Ky went to school James 11 Male Ky went to school Rebecca 9 Female Ky went to school Perry 7 Male Ky Malvina 4 Female Ky
1818 - UNKNOWN
Sarah
"Sally"
Wesley
1789 - 1874
Nimrod
Randolph
85
85
1850 - 1922
Louisa
"Luce"
Wesley
71
71
1807 - UNKNOWN
William
Dye
1810 - UNKNOWN
Mary
"Polly"
Dye
1843 - UNKNOWN
Elizabeth
Dick
1820 - 1877
Green
Berry
N. Dick
57
57
Info from the 1870 Pulaski County Kentucky census record book page 146, household number 15: Dick, Green B. 50 M Farmer 857 Ky Sarah 48 F Ky Nancy J. 20 F Ky Wm M. 18 M Ky Robert J. 16 M Ky George G. 13 M Ky Mary E. 11 F Ky James A. 7 M Ky Thomas 5 M Ky Sarah M. 3 F Ky From the 1850 Pulaski County, Kentucky census page 213 Dictrict 2 Household Number 598: Dick, Berry 30 M Farmer Ky Sarah 24 F Ky Katharine 3 F Ky Nancy J. 1 F Ky
1827 - UNKNOWN
Balis W
"Bulers"
Dick
1837 - 1909
Lydia
"Liddie"
Wesley
72
72
D. 1788
Rebecca
Randolph
1812 - 1882
Mary
"Polly"
Dick
70
70
1846 - 1922
James
William
Spears
76
76
Household: Name Relation Marital Status Gender Race Age Birthplace Occupation Father's Birthplace Mother's Birthplace James W. SPEARS Self M Male W 33 KY Farmer KY VA Isabelle SPEARS Wife M Female W 25 KY Keeping House KY KY George R. SPEARS Son S Male W 5 KY KY KY Hezekiah SPEARS Son S Male W 3 KY KY KY Albert T. SPEARS Son S Male W 2 KY KY KY Rufus S. SPEARS Son S Male W 3M KY KY KY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Source Information: Census Place District 1 And 2, Pulaski, Kentucky Family History Library Film 1254440 NA Film Number T9-0440 Page Number 71A
1836 - 1897
John
Marion
Barber
61
61
It is said that John fathered 19 children w @ least 3 different women Hi Linda: I was just looking at your website on Family Tree Maker. You have the following: (I think it's under where you have Pochantas lineage): John Marion Barber (b. 1836): 1st. md. Malvina Spaw 2nd. md. Emily Spaw 3rd. md. Matilda Wesley 4th. md. Sophia Wesley John was only Married 2 times. John M. Barber (b. 1836) "1st. married" 1855 to Malvina (Spaw). He "2nd. married" 1892 to Sophia (Wesley) Warren. As for Emily, she was living in the household with John in the 1870 Census of Casey Co., Ky. - shown as Housekeeper. / 1880 Census of Casey Co., Ky. they were still living in the same household, except this time, it shows her as his "wife." I have found absolutely no "Legal Documents" showing a marriage for these two. But if Kentucky in that time frame recognized "Common-Law" than they may have been common-law; but still no documents has ever been located for them. As for Matilda, her & John were NEVER married, or never lived together. Yes they had a son together, but there absolutely no "Legal Documents" even showing that. The child had told one of his children or grandchildren that his father was John Barber. I am a descendant from John & Malvina. My great-grandfather was their son. Elsie elsgibbs@worldnet.att.net
1830 - UNKNOWN
Isabell
Jane "Ibby"
Barber
1834 - 1904
John "Tater
John"
Wesley
69
69
1832 - UNKNOWN
Tabitha
Dye
Generated by GenoPro®. Click here for details.
A 'genogram' depicting a family tree should appear here
If no diagram is shown then either of the following could be the cause:
The diagram has been produced as a PDF and either no PDF viewer has been installed or the diagram has been opened in another window.
The diagram has been produced in SVG format (Scaleable Vector Graphic) and either you are using Internet Explorer version 8 or below, in this case you should install the 'Adobe SVG Viewer', or you are using another browser that does not support SVG
You are using Google Chrome browser but are viewing the report locally on a PC directly from the generated files (i.e. via the 'File' protocol) rather than via a web/HTTP server