Family Notes

[Joanne's Tree.1 GED.GED]

[daveanthes.FTW]

_FREL Natural
_MREL Natural

_FREL Natural
_MREL Natural
TITL Garner, Lorraine Ann "Lori"
PUBL P.O. Box 577, Bayview, ID  83803
Her sources included, but may not be limited to: Burke's Landed Gentry, Burke's Dormant & Extinct Peerage, Burke's Peerage of American Presidents, Debrett's Peerage, Oxford histories & "numerous
other reference works"
very good to excellent, although she has a tendency to follow Burke's
REPO
Hardcopy notes of Lori Garner Elmore.
CALN
MEDI Letter
TITL Ancestry of Richard Plantagenet & Cecily de Neville
AUTH Ernst-Friedrich Kraentzler
PUBL published by author 1978
REPO
J.H. Garner
CALN
MEDI Book
PAGE chart 1063
TITL Ahnentafel for Margery Arundell
AUTH Marlyn Lewis
PUBL 08 Oct 1997
REPO
CALN
MEDI Manuscript
TITL Lineage & Ancestry of HRH Prince Charles, Prince of Wales
AUTH Gerald Paget
PUBL Skilton, Edinburgh 1977
REPO
CALN
MEDI Book
PAGE Vol I p 65
TITL The Plantagenet Ancestry
AUTH W.H. Turton
PUBL Genealogical Publishing Comp, Baltimore, 1928 (reproduced 1993)
Being Tables Showing Over 7,000 of the Ancestors of Elizabeth (Daughter of Edward IV and Wife of Henry VII) The Heiress of the Plantagenets, with Preface, Lists, Notes and a Complete Index.
poor
REPO
J.H. Garner
CALN
MEDI Book
PAGE p 81
TITL Descents from Antiquity
AUTH The Augustan Society
Chris Bennett (cbennett@@nospam.com) writes: The Augustan DFA charts show lines from the 17th Egyptian dynasty to the medieval English kings. There are no "proven"  descents going over that period.
There are two major problem with the DFA charts:  (1) they don't distinguish  between proven descents and hypothetical ones, giving the uninitiated the impression that this is all proven material,
and (2) there is no bibliography so you can't follow up on it [one was intended but the Augustans never got around to publishing it.]   The hypotheses used are not always the best ones -- in many
cases they are very old and IMO certainly wrong -- but they are not fantasies, the ones I have identified (mostly in the earlier sections) are always the results of someone's serious scholarship.
Stewart Baldwin (sbald@@auburn.campus.mci.net) arites: There are a number of Descents from Antiquity charts floating around, and the answer to your question depends on which line you are interested
in and what you want to know about it.  If you want a well documented generation-by-generation descent from antiquity, then the
answer is that none of the charts purporting to give such a descent are valid.  Depending on which claim for descent from antiquity you are talking about, the assessment would generally range from
plausible (but definitely unproven) to completely absurd.
REPO
CALN
MEDI Book
PAGE chart X