General Notes

[2901027.ged]
[2762884.ged]
[2759404.ged]
[2751731.ged]
[2722902.ged]
TITL geddown.ged
REPO
CALN
MEDI Other
DATA
T EXT Date of Imp ort: Oct 17, 20 03
TITL geddown.ged
REPO
CAL N
MEDI Other
D ATA
TEXT Date o f Import: Oct 17 , 2003
TITL geddown.ged
RE PO
CALN
MEDI Ot her
DATA
TEXT D ate of Import: Oc t 17, 2003[geddown.ged]
GIVN Margaret De
SURN Kerdeston
TI TL emsuggs.ged
DA TA
TITL 2645847.ged
D ATA
TITL 2657668. ged
DATA
TITL 265 9833.ged
DATA
TIT L 2667856.ged
DATA
TITL 2671169.ged
DATA
TITL 2680041.g ed
DATA
TITL 26842 72.ged
REPO @@R500 221903@@
DATA
TITL 2687954.ged
REPO @@R 500221902@@
DATA
TIT L emsuggs.ged
D ATA
TITL 2645847.g ed
DATA
TITL 2657668 .ged
DATA
TITL 26598 33.ged
DATA
TITL 2667856.ged
D ATA
TITL 2671169.ged
DATA
TITL 2680041.ged
DATA
TITL 2684272.ged
REPO @@R5 00221903@@
DATA
TITL 2 687954.ged
REPO @@R5002 21902@@
D ATA
DATE 31 Dec 2002
TITL emsuggs.ged
DATA
TITL 2645847.ged
DATA
TITL 265 7668.ged
DATA
TITL 2 659833.ged
DATA
TITL 2 667856.ged
DATA
TITL 2 671169 .ged
DATA
TITL 268004 1.ged
DATA
TITL 2684272 .ged
REPO @@R500221903@@
DATA
TITL 2687954.ged
REPO @@R500221902@@
DATA
[2687 954.ged]
[2684272.ged]
[26 80041.ged]
[2671169.ged ]
[2667856.ged]
[2659833. ged]
[2657668.ged]
[264 5847.ged]
REFN : ems-jw
[emsu ggs.ged]
The b irth dates are extremely tight in this pedigr e e, but C P insis ts
that Margare t is daughter o f William d e Kerdesto n by hi s 3rd wife,
desp ite a deposition in 1453 that Mar gar et w a s daughter of Will ia
m's
1st
wife. Margaret w as ap paren tly "illegiti mat e" despite her parent 's
marriage becau se sh e was born earlier than thei r m ar riage date.
----- -- ------ ------------ ----- -
In 1453 t here was a furthe r t r ial, Alice, D uchess of Suffol k,
compl ai ning of trespass by Jo hn Howard , of St oke Nayla nd , esq . and
his
minister s atBulcamp and Hen h am in January 1 450/1. Howar d alleged that
Roge r Kerdest o n, chr., formerl y held the esta tes and ha d issue
Willia
m
Kerdeston , ch r., w ho was marr ied in St. Botolph 's Church , No rwich,
to
Ma rgare t Bacou n and ha d a da ughter Margar et. Marg ar et th e wife di
e
d
before Roger. Afte rwar ds the s aid William married at th e s am e church
one
Alice Norw iche, bu t before th e m arriage t hey had a son Will iam
Kerdeston
th e young er. Will iam the fa ther di ed in Roger's lifeti me. After
Roger's
death t he sai d da ughterMar gare t, at Norwich in the same ch u rch,
wedde
d
William Te nderyng, chr.,a nd they h ad a son Wil!lam Tende ryn g the
younger, chr., who l eft a dau ghte r Alice [and sh e had issue Robert
H ow ard], who had issue the de f endant Jo hn Howard. Wil li am Kerdeston
the
y o unger had issue Leonard ( called Lau r ence elsewhere) Ker d eston, wh
o
had
a s on Thoma s Kerdeston, who had poss e ssion of the estates a n d
enfeoffe
d
the D uchess of them.
This d epositi onca n be proved to be wr ong in severa l ess ent i als.
The Duchess in reply alleged t hat Margaret wife of Wil lia m Tendr yn, wa
s
the issue of Wil liam Kerdeston by one Margar et C obold, be fore
marriage.
W illiam had by Mar ga ret Bacon o nly on e daughter-Ma ud. S he mar r ied
John
Burgh ersh, knight , who had a son John, who had a daugh te r Maud, m o
ther
of th e Du chess. S he did not admit the defendant 's stateme n t abou t
Wi lliam Kerdeston the yo ung e r; but Roger Kerdeston certai nly h eld th
e
land s in dispute, and on bi s dea thwas succeed ed by his son Wil liam
Ker deston. This William enfeoffed Wil li am Bergh and others, who in turn
e nfeoff e d Willi am Ke rdes ton the youn ger , wh o thus came into
possession.
He had a so n Le onard, w hose son Thomas e nfeo ffed William, Duke of
Suff
olk, wh o enfeof fed Maud Chauc er, who had issue th e Duchess , who thus
ent ered as d aug hter a n d heir and h ad possess io n till d isseised by
Howard. [Complete Peerage VII:1