Click to enlarge/reduce the GenoMap image Hide this GenoMap frame

Family Subtree Diagram : Descendants of William FitzWilliam (1232)

PLEASE NOTE: If you do not see a GRAPHIC IMAGE of a family tree here but are seeing this text instead then it is most probably because the web server is not correctly configured to serve svg pages correctly. see http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/SVG:Server_Configuration for information on how to correctly configure a web server for svg files. ? Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child (a child) (a child) (a child) (a child) (a child) (a child) 1232 William FitzWilliam 1233 Agnes de Grey 1350 - 1398 @William FitzWilliam 48 48 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1366 - 1418 @Maud de Cromwell 52 52 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1328 - 1419 @Elizabeth Clinton 91 91 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1288 - 1349 @John FitzWilliam 61 61 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1292 @Jane (Joan) de Reresby *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1270 - 1342 @William FitzWilliam 72 72 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1270 - 1348 @Isabel (Maude) Deincourt 78 78 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1411 @John FitzWilliam *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1377 - 1417 @John FitzWilliam 39 39 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1380 - 1420 @Eleanor Greene 40 40 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1327 - 22 FEB 1384/1385 @John FitzWilliam *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? Generated by GenoPro®. Click here for details.