PLEASE NOTE: If you do not see a GRAPHIC IMAGE of a family tree here but are seeing this text
instead then it is most probably because the web server is not correctly configured to serve svg
pages correctly.
see http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/SVG:Server_Configuration for information on how to
correctly configure a web server for svg files.
?
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
Parent
Parent
Biological Child
Biological Child
Biological Child
(a child)
Marriage (a child)
Marriage (eleven children)
Marriage (a child)
Marriage (a child)
Marriage (nine children)
Marriage (five children)
Marriage (a child)
Marriage (three children)
Marriage
(a child)
Marriage (a child)
Marriage (two children)
(a child)
(two children)
(a child)
(a child)
(a child)
Marriage (a child)
Marriage
~1293
Idonea
de
Lisle
1290
Hugh
de
Beauchamp
1451 - 1501
Thomas
Grey
50
50
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1442 - 1483
EDWARD
40
40
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1438 - 1489
Anne
Wydeville
51
51
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1431
William
Bourchier
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1437 - 1492
Elizabeth
WYDEVILLE
55
55
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1479 - 1527
Catherine
of
York
48
48
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1465 - 1502
Elizabeth
of
York
37
37
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1467 - 1482
Mary
Plantagenet
15
15
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1468 - 1507
Cecilia
Plantagenet
39
39
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1470 - 1483
Edward
12
12
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1472 - 1472
Margaret
Plantagenet
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1473 - 1483
Richard
Plantagenet
10
10
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1475 - 1511
Anne
Plantagenet
36
36
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1476 - 1479
George
Plantagenet
3
3
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1480 - 1517
Bridget
Plantagenet
37
37
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1494 - 1566
Honora
Grenville
72
72
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1455 - 1512
Thomas
GRENVILLE
57
57
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1455 - 1483
Henry
de
Stafford
28
28
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1415 - 1472
Jacquette
de
LUXEMBOURG
57
57
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1449 - 1480
Joan
Wydeville
31
31
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1470 - 1503
George
Grey
33
33
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1477 - 1521
Edward
de
Stafford
44
44
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1432 - >1461
John
Grey
29
29
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1458
Catherine
Wydeville
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1431 - 1495
Jaspar
Tudor
64
64
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1474
Jane
Grenville
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1480 - >1545
Catherine
Grenville
65
65
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1430 - 1483
Thomas
GRENVILLE
53
53
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1435 - >1455
Elizabeth
de
GORGES
20
20
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1477 - 1524
Roger
Grenville
47
47
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1385 - >1441
Richard
WYDEVILLE
56
56
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1385 - >1448
Joan
BITTELSGATE
63
63
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1350 - 1388
Thomas
BITTELSGATE
38
38
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1360 - <1388
Joan
de
BEAUCHAMP
28
28
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1325 - >1396
John
de
BEAUCHAMP
71
71
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1450 - <1490
Margaret
Wydeville
40
40
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1450
Charles
Churchill
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1475
Thomas
Churchill
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1405 - 1469
Richard
WYDEVILLE
64
64
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1444 - <1475
Jacquette
Wydeville
31
31
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
Earl of
Arundel
Thomas
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1335 - >1384
Joan
de
BRIDPORT
49
49
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1445
John
Wydeville
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
Duchess
of Norfolk
Catherine
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1440 - 1483
Anthony
Wydeville
43
43
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
Scales
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
Mary
FitzLewis
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1483
Anne
de
Stafford
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
D. 1523
Henry
de
Stafford
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1444
John
le
Strange
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1472 - 1539
William
Henry
Bourchier
67
67
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1401 - 1470
Theobald
de
GORGES
68
68
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1399 - 1470
Joane
HANKEFORD
71
71
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1355 - 1404
Thomas
de
GORGES
49
49
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1369 - 1419
Agnes
de
BEAUCHAMP
50
50
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1476
Elizabeth
Herbert
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1456
Mary
Wydeville
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1450 - <1480
Anthony
Grey
30
30
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1463 - 1513
Joan
le
Strange
50
50
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1477 - 1523
Richard
Grey
46
46
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1450
Miss
Tudor
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
1479 - 1537
Agnes
GRENVILLE
58
58
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1459
Isabella
GILBERT
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1455 - 1491
William
Herbert
36
36
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1410
Elizabeth
Wydeville
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
~1478 - 1528
Margaret
PLANTAGENET
50
50
For those who may mistakenly believe that because I've posted my genealogy online that I'm claiming that it is MY OWN PERSONAL RESEARCH - IT IS NOT. I owe most of it to hundreds of researchers who have helped me over the past 50+ years who have more expertise and better access to primary sources than I have. <br /><br />I have purposely omitted many sources out of respect, but some I have also included, for that same reason. Some information here is "on speculation only" in the hope that someone will respectfully share corrections with me. Please be aware, that as with EVERY genealogy - there are errors in here!<br /><br />Also, this is not a religion with me, it is just sort of a 'sacred hobby' to learn more about my own roots in order to pass it on to family members who have also been bitten by the 'Genealogy bug' after I've gone.
Generated by GenoPro®. Click here for details.
A 'genogram' depicting a family tree should appear here
Family Subtree Diagram : Descendants of Hugh de Beauchamp (1290)