General Notes

"The evidence... suggests that Margery married Giles befor
e 1239 and lived until 1267, when Giles is mentioned, but w
as probably dead by c.1274, when her son Reginald appears (
there is no doubt that Reginald was of age by 1267). Judgin
g by
Jordan de Sackville's Oxfordshire Inquisition Post Mortem
, and others quoted by Phillips, his son Andrew was bor
n 9 October 1253, at which date Margery was certainly marri
ed to Giles de Argentein. Andrew de Sackville does not appe
ar in
connection with the property until c.1282 (although Blomefi
eld (vol.2, pp.181,183; vol.8, pp.412,413) gives some refer
ences vaguely dated 'temp.Henry III', in fact they must b
e later). The later records quoted by Phillips must be in e
rror
(Andrew perhaps being changed from 'successor' of Margery i
nto her 'heir').
Note:
One other feature of Margery's (who married Giles de Argent
ein) ancestry disclosed by the evidence above is that her m
other was Margery, the daughter of William de Fresney, an
d not, as usually stated, Agatha, the daughter and coheir o
f Fulk de
Beaufo (Blomefield, vol.2, p.178, vol.8, pp.412,413; Farrer
, vol.3, p.111). Note that Phillips makes this Agatha the m
other, not the wife, of Robert Aguillon, which would resolv
e the problem.