Click to enlarge/reduce the GenoMap image Hide this GenoMap frame

Family Subtree Diagram : Descendants of Maud Bernacke (1347)

PLEASE NOTE: If you do not see a GRAPHIC IMAGE of a family tree here but are seeing this text instead then it is most probably because the web server is not correctly configured to serve svg pages correctly. see http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/SVG:Server_Configuration for information on how to correctly configure a web server for svg files. ? Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Parent Biological Child Parent (a child) (a child) (a child) (a child) (a child) (two children) 1347 - 1419 Maud Bernacke 72 72 He [Ralph de Cromwell] married, before 20 June 1366, Maud, sister and heir of William, who died 18 December 1360, and daughter of John BERNAKE (c), of Tattershall, by Joan, daughter and eventual coheir of John MARMION [LORD MARMION]. He died 27
August 1398. His widow died 10 April 1419. [Complete Peerage III:551-2 , XIV:224, (transcribed by Dave Utzinger)] 1350 - 1398 @William FitzWilliam 48 48 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1366 - 1418 @Maud de Cromwell 52 52 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1327 - 1398 *@Ralph VI de Cromwell 71 71 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1533 @Elizabeth Shelley *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1497 - 1550 @John Shelley 53 53 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1512 @Mary FitzWilliam *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1450 - 1534 @William FitzWilliam 84 84 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1480 @Maud Mildred Sackville *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1411 @John FitzWilliam *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1430 @Helen Ellen *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1377 - 1417 @John FitzWilliam 39 39 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1380 - 1420 @Eleanor Greene 40 40 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1369 - 19 FEB 1406/1407 *Thomas Bardolf *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1370 - 1421 *Amice de Cromwell 51 51 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? Generated by GenoPro®. Click here for details.