Click to enlarge/reduce the GenoMap image Hide this GenoMap frame

Family Subtree Diagram : Descendants of Joan de Beaumont (1309)

PLEASE NOTE: If you do not see a GRAPHIC IMAGE of a family tree here but are seeing this text instead then it is most probably because the web server is not correctly configured to serve svg pages correctly. see http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/SVG:Server_Configuration for information on how to correctly configure a web server for svg files. ? Parent Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Biological Child Parent Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Biological Child Parent (a child) (a child) (a child) (two children) (a child) (a child) (a child) (a child) (four children) 1309 Joan de Beaumont 1374 - 1397 @Elizabeth Cogan 23 23 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1411 John Cole *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1415 Janet Merlott *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1415 Robert Roger *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1445 - 1479 @Fulk Bourchier 33 33 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1412 - 1469 @William Bourghchier 57 57 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1300 - 1349 @Fulk VII FitzWarin 49 49 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 2 MAR 1340/1341 - 1374 @Fulk VIII FitzWarin *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 2 MAR 1361/1362 - 1391 @Fulk IX FitzWarin *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1389 - 1407 @Fulk X FitzWarin 18 18 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1403 - ABT 10 FEB 1425/1426 @Elizabeth FitzWarin *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 23 FEB 1422/1423 - 1453 @Thomasine Hankeford *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1390 - 1420 @Anne Botreaux 30 30 *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1343 @Margaret Daudeleye *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1397 - 8 FEB 1430/1431 @* Richard Hankeford *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1467 @John Cole *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1441 @William Cole *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1413 @William Cole *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1383 @John Cole *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1389 @Agnes FitzWarin *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? 1409 Adam Cole *Forrest=fathers direct line,! dna connections
@@Stolp=mothers direct line
+Tamer=husbands direct line
#Wallace & ^Stuetelberg=son-in-laws direct lines
all lines separated.With multiple marks cross over lines
without documentations all is speculative/with ??? Generated by GenoPro®. Click here for details.